Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Nov 26:18:1520012.
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1520012. eCollection 2024.

Editorial: Reproducible analysis in neuroscience

Stavros I Dimitriadis  1   2   3   4 , Vignayanandam Ravindernath Muddapu  5 , Roberto Guidotti  6   7
Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial: Reproducible analysis in neuroscience

Stavros I Dimitriadis et al. Front Neuroinform. .
No abstract available

Keywords: R&R studies; analytic pipelines; neuroimaging (anatomic and functional); neuroscience; repeatability and reproducibility; reproducibility of results; reproducible analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The key elements of reproducible (neuro)science. Open—source platforms; FAIR (meta)data; shared, detailed methods; shared source code; shared search reagents; documentation; research resource identifies (RRIDs); library version + containerization (e.g., Docker).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

  • Editorial on the Research Topic Reproducible analysis in neuroscience

References

    1. Association for Computing Machinery (2016). Artifact Review and Badging. Available at: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-badging (accessed November 24, 2017).
    1. Auer S., Haelterman N. A., Weissberger T. L., Erlich J. C., Susilaradeya D., Julkowska M., et al. . (2021). Reproducibility for everyone team. A community-led initiative for training in reproducible research. Elife 10:e64719. 10.7554/eLife.64719 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botvinik-Nezer R., Holzmeister F., Camerer C. F., Dreber A., Huber J., Johannesson M., et al. . (2020). Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 582, 84–88. 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botvinik-Nezer R., Wager T. D. (2023). Reproducibility in neuroimaging analysis: challenges and solutions. Biol. Psychiat. 8, 780–788. 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crook S., Davison A. P., Plesser H. E. (2013). “Learning from the past: approaches for reproducibility in computational neuroscience,” in 20 Years in Computational Neuroscience, ed. J. M. Bower (New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; ), 73–102.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources