Comparison of Innovative and Conventional Methods in Biosimilar Bridging Studies with Multiple References
- PMID: 39659564
- PMCID: PMC11630730
- DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S470182
Comparison of Innovative and Conventional Methods in Biosimilar Bridging Studies with Multiple References
Abstract
For assessment of biosimilar drug products, if there are multiple-reference products (eg, a US-licensed product and an EU-approved product), a biosimilar bridging study with a 3-way pairwise comparison is often conducted. In our paper, two innovative methods in biosimilar bridging study are compared with the conventional method of pairwise comparisons. For parallel study design, the simultaneous confidence interval (CI) method is compared to the convention method. For crossover study design, the multiplicity-adjusted Schuirmann's two one-sided tests (MATOST) is considered. This paper conclude that the simultaneous CI method achieves the similar statistical power to the conventional approach in biosimilarity assessment. However, the MATOST method using the conservative Holm and Bonferroni approaches is not favorable since it leads to a large sample size although it controls the type I error rate.
Keywords: MATOST; bioequivalence and biosimilarity; multiple references; multiplicity-adjusted two one-sided tests; simultaneous confidence interval approach.
© 2024 Pong et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Pong A is the employees of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, who own stock in Merck & Co., Inc.. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- EMA. European Medicines Agency. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-si.... Accessed December 27, 2022.
-
- EMA. Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2014.
-
- FDA. Guidance for Industry—Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Silver Spring, Maryland: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA); 2015.
-
- FDA. Guidance for Industry - Statistical Approaches to Evaluate Analytical Similarity. Silver Spring, Maryland: The United States Food and Drug Administration; 2017.
-
- FDA. Guidance for Industry - Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability with a Reference Product. Silver Spring, Maryland: The United States Food and Drug Administration; 2019.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
