Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 9;7(12):e70246.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70246. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Voice Analysis as a Method for Preoperatively Predicting a Difficult Airway Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: Original Research Report

Affiliations

Voice Analysis as a Method for Preoperatively Predicting a Difficult Airway Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: Original Research Report

Claudia Rodiera et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: An unanticipated difficult airway is one of the greatest challenges for anesthesiologists. Proper preoperative airway assessment is crucial to reducing complications. However, current screening tests based on anthropometric features are of uncertain benefit. Therefore, our study explores using voice analysis with machine learning algorithms to predict a difficult airway.

Methods: Observational, multicenter study with N = 438 patients initially enrolled at Centro Medico Teknon and Institut Universitari Dexeus (2019-2022) for the research study. After excluding 125 patients, N = 313 were included. Ethics committee approval was obtained. Adults ASA I-III scheduled for elective procedures under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were selected. Patient clinical features and traditional predictive tests were collected. Vowels "A, E, I, O, U" were recorded in normal, flexion, and extension positions. Cormack grade was assessed, and data were analyzed using KNIME, resulting in multiple models based on demographics and voice data. ROC curves and other metrics were evaluated for each model.

Results: Among multiple models evaluated, two yielded the best performance to predict a difficult airway both exclusively analyzing Cormack I and IV cases which showed the most distinct differences. The variables included in each model were the following: Model 1; included demographic data, vowel "A" in all positions and harmonics of the voice achieving an AUC of 0.91. Model 2; Included demographic data, vowel "O" in normal positions and voice parameters (Shimmer, Jitter, HNR); achieving in an AUC of 0.90. In contrast, models which focused on analyzing all Cormack grades (I, II, III, IV) cases performed less effectively.

Conclusions: Acoustic parameters of the voice together with the demographic data of the patients, when introduced into classification algorithms based on machine learning showed promising signs of predicting a difficult airway.

Keywords: acoustic parameters; difficult airway prediction; machine learning; voice analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the patient selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Voice recording flowchart showing different voice recording positions and vocals. Website voice.anestalia.com (Own production).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Data collection platform (Own production).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Data set partitioning: 70% Training/Validation and 30% test.

Similar articles

References

    1. Başpinar Ş. M., Günüşen İ., Sergin D., Sargin A., and Balcioğlu S. T., “Evaluation of Anthropometric Measurements and Clinical Tests in the Diagnosis of Difficult Airway in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 52, no. 3 (2022): 730–740. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apfelbaum J. L., Hagberg C. A., Connis R. T., et al., “2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway,” Anesthesiology 136, no. 1 (January 2022): 31–81. - PubMed
    1. Joffe A. M., Aziz M. F., Posner K. L., Duggan L. V., Mincer S. L., and Domino K. B., “Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: A Closed Claims Analysis,” Anesthesiology 1 (October 2020): 818–829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joffe A. M., Aziz M. F., Posner K. L., Duggan L. V., Mincer S. L., and Domino K. B., “Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation,” Anesthesiology 131, no. 4 (2019): 818–829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crosby E. T., Duggan L. V., Finestone P. J., Liu R., De Gorter R., and Calder L. A., “Anesthesiology Airway‐Related Medicolegal Cases From the Canadian Medical Protection Association,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 68, no. 2 (February 2021): 183–195. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources