Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Feb;17(2):575-582.
doi: 10.1111/os.14316. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Effect of Decellularized Amniotic Membrane on the Tendon-Bone Integration in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparative Rat Model Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of Decellularized Amniotic Membrane on the Tendon-Bone Integration in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Comparative Rat Model Study

Jiangtao Wang et al. Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Rotator cuff retear after arthroscopy repair is a difficult complication that is often due to poor tendon-bone healing. Decellularized amniotic membrane (DAM) has a variety of bioactive substances which have great potential to enhance tendon-bone healing. However, DAM has three layers, of which the middle basement layer is dense and thick. Whether DAM will hinder tendon-bone healing of rotator cuff after surgical repair is unclear. Our study aims to investigate the effect of DAM on tendon-bone healing of the rotator cuff after surgical repair.

Methods: Thirty-three Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were selected to establish unilateral supraspinatus (ST) tear models and were randomly treated with only suturing repair (OSR group, n = 11), and suturing repair with DAM placed between the ST and bone (DAM group, n = 11). In the normal control group (NCT group, n = 11), the supraspinatus was only exposed but not detached or repaired. After 4 weeks the rats were sacrificed. The assessment of specimens was conducted by micro-CT analysis, histopathological evaluation, and biomechanical testing.

Results: The DAM group had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure, new bone volume, and histological evaluation at 4 weeks after surgery than the OSR group. When comparing the DAM group to the NCT group, the DAM group performed slightly worse in biomechanical testing, micro-CT analysis, and histological evaluation.

Conclusion: When placed between tendon and bone at the rotator cuff footprint, DAM, despite its dense and thick basement layer, does not impede tendon-bone healing after surgical repair for rotator cuff injury, but rather promotes increased healing quality and biomechanical properties. However, the healing quality and biomechanical properties are still lower than that of the normal rotator cuff, and further improvement should be made to the application strategy of a DAM.

Keywords: decellularized amniotic membrane; retear; rotator cuff injury; surgical repair; tendon–bone healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A specimen was fixed on a biomechanical testing machine (BOSE5100 system, USA). (a) Front view; (b) Side view.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative micro‐CT images of new bone formation at rotator cuff insertion of the three groups at 4 weeks after surgery. (a) NCT group; (b) DAM group; (c) OSR group.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of new bone formation among groups at postoperative weeks 4. BMD: bone mineral density; BV/TV: bone volume fraction; Tb.Th: trabecular thickness; *indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01; *** indicates p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Histopathological evaluation of rotator cuff insertion stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) at postoperative weeks 4. the scale bar represents 500 μm. (a) NCT group; (b) DAM group; (c) OSR group. B: bone; IF: interface; T: tendon.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Histopathological evaluation of regenerated fibrocartilage stained with SO/FG staining at postoperative weeks 4, the scale bar represents 500 μm. SO/FG: Safranin O and Fast Green staining; (a) NCT group; (b) DAM group; (c) OSR group. B: bone; IF: interface; T: tendon.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Comparison of the results of histopathological evaluation by modified Bonar score. *** indicates p < 0.001.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Comparison of the results of biomechanical testing among the three groups. * indicates p < 0.05; *** indicates p < 0.001.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dang A. and Davies M., “Rotator Cuff Disease: Treatment Options and Considerations,” Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 26, no. 3 (2018): 129–133. - PubMed
    1. Kwon D. R., Jung S. M., Jang J., et al., “A 3‐Dimensional Bioprinted Scaffold With Human Umbilical Cord Blood–Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves Regeneration of Chronic Full‐Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear in a Rabbit Model,” American Journal of Sports Medicine 48, no. 4 (2020): 947–958. - PubMed
    1. Aguado G., Obando D. V., Herrera G. A., Ramirez A., and Llinás P. J., “Retears of the Rotator Cuff: An Ultrasonographic Assessment During the First Postoperative Year,” Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 7, no. 12 (2019): 2325967119889049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rossi L. A., Chahla J., Verma N. N., Millett P. J., and Ranalletta M., “Retears of the Rotator Cuff,” JBJS Reviews 8, no. 1 (2020): e0039. - PubMed
    1. Jensen A. R., Taylor A. J., and Sotelo J. S., “Factors Influencing the Reparability and Healing Rates of Rotator Cuff Tears,” Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 13, no. 5 (2020): 572–583. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types