Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;47(2):313-317.
doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14416. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria on START2 Antiphospholipid Registry

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria on START2 Antiphospholipid Registry

Anna Aiello et al. Int J Lab Hematol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: The recently published ACR/EULAR classification criteria score (3 points or more) both clinical and laboratory criteria to define the presence of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The clinical criteria have been better defined while laboratory criteria remain the same [lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2-Glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies] but with different impact (points) on the classification of patients. APS is excluded if more than 3 years separate positive test for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and clinical manifestation.

Methods: The present study evaluates how many patients would be excluded by the new criteria among those enrolled as APS in the START 2 antiphospholipid registry. The analysis includes 380 patients (274 APS and 106 carriers).

Results: Of 274 patients classified as APS, 118 (43%) did not match the new ACR/EULAR criteria for various reasons. First, the determination of aCL and aß2GPI antibodies was performed by automated instrumentations not allowed in the new criteria. Second, laboratory test score was less than 3 and this was due to an isolated IgM aCL or IgM aß2GPI in most cases and to isolated LA unconfirmed after 12 weeks in few cases. Third, 2 patients had a positive laboratory tests more than 3 years after the clinical event. Of the 106 carriers, 62% had aCL and aß2GPI determined by ELISA thus meeting the ACL/EULAR laboratory criteria but were negative for clinical criteria.

Discussion: This study shows that many patients classified as APS in the START 2 registry do not match the classification using the new ACR/EULAR criteria.

Keywords: antiphospholipid antibodies; antiphospholipid syndrome; classification; criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. M. Barbhaiya, S. Zuily, R. Naden, et al., “2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 82, no. 10 (2023): 1258–1270.
    1. S. Miyakis, M. D. Lockshin, T. Atsumi, et al., “International Consensus Statement on an Update of the Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS),” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 4, no. 2 (2006): 295–306.
    1. E. J. Favaloro, L. Pasalic, and G. Lippi, “Classification Criteria for the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Not the Same as Diagnostic Criteria for Antiphospholipid Syndrome,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 50, no. 4 (2024): 605–608.
    1. E. Antonucci, D. Poli, A. Tosetto, et al., “The Italian START‐Register on Anticoagulation With Focus on Atrial Fibrillation,” PLoS One 10, no. 5 (2015): e0124719.
    1. K. M. J. Devreese, P. G. de Groot, B. de Laat, et al., “Guidance From the Scientific and Standardization Committee for Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Update of the Guidelines for Lupus Anticoagulant Detection and Interpretation,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 18, no. 11 (2020): 2828–2839.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources