Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jan;58(1):213-224.
doi: 10.1002/jaba.2928. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Effectiveness of video self-monitoring for training and maintaining procedural fidelity during covert observations

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effectiveness of video self-monitoring for training and maintaining procedural fidelity during covert observations

Amber R Paden et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that low procedural fidelity can lead to decreased effectiveness and efficiency of skill acquisition during discrete-trial instruction. Previous research has also found that procedural fidelity may be substantially lower when a supervisor is not present to observe the session. Finding a socially acceptable, effective, and efficient method to increase and maintain high levels of staff members' procedural fidelity during covert observations is critical in the clinic setting. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of video self-monitoring in increasing and maintaining high procedural fidelity among staff who implement discrete-trial instruction during covert and overt observations. Participants included four staff members working one-on-one with children with autism spectrum disorder. The results show that video self-monitoring was effective at increasing staff members' procedural fidelity and maintaining high fidelity over time.

Keywords: covert observation; overt observation; procedural fidelity; reactivity; self‐monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of correct fidelity for Participants 1 and 2. The dashed horizontal line denotes 90% correct implementation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage of correct fidelity for Participants 3 and 4.

References

    1. Alexander, M. , Williams, N. A. , & Nelson, K. L. (2017). When you can't get there: Using video self‐monitoring as a tool for changing behaviors of pre‐service teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 18–24. 10.1177/875687051203100404 - DOI
    1. Austin, J. , & Carr, J. E. (2000). Practical strategies for increasing treatment integrity in school settings. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2(1), 17–24.
    1. Baer, D. M. , Wolf, M. M. , & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. 10.1901/jaba.1968.1.91 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behavior Analyst Certification Board . (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. https://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/
    1. Belfiore, P. J. , Fritts, K. M. , & Herman, B. C. (2008). The role of procedural integrity: Using self‐monitoring to enhance discrete trial instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23(2), 95–102. 10.1177/1088357607311445 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources