Social Risk Factors Associated With Microbial Keratitis
- PMID: 39661074
- PMCID: PMC12149330
- DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003766
Social Risk Factors Associated With Microbial Keratitis
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify social risk factors (SRFs) that affect microbial keratitis (MK) care using the Penchansky-Thomas (P-T) health care access framework.
Methods: This combined retrospective and prospective cohort study recruited participants with newly diagnosed MK at an academic medical center. Participant demographic information and SRFs were collected using in-person interviews and chart review. SRFs were categorized into P-T framework domains. Primary analysis included proportion of participants reporting SRFs, distribution of reported SRFs, and demographic differences associated with SRFs using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and two-sample t tests. A subgroup analysis for participants who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) was performed.
Results: A total of 100 participants with MK were included in this study. Of the 100 participants, 60.0% reported at least 1 SRF affecting care, 42.0% reported ≥2 SRFs, and 12.0% reported ≥4 SRFs; 40.0% had no SRFs. More SRFs were reported for participants with lower income versus those with higher income ($25,000-$50,000 vs. $51,000-$100,000, P = 0.0363); there were no other demographic differences between groups. The most reported SRF was distance to appointment (45.0%). Accessibility was the most reported P-T domain (49.0%). Participants with LTFU, compared with those not LTFU, had more SRFs (100% vs. 52.4%, P = 0.0001) and reported a greater median number of SRFs (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: SRFs affected most patients with MK, most notably accessibility and affordability. Participants with lower income had more SRFs. SRFs are linked to patients being lost to follow-up care.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04420962.
Keywords: barriers to care; loss to follow-up; microbial keratitis; social determinants of health; social risk factors.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–e1234. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- D43 TW012027/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
- R01EY031337-03S1/National Eye Institute (US)
- R01 EY031337/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- K12 GM111725/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- K12EY022299/National Eye Institute (US)
- P30EY007003/National Eye Institute (US)
- R01EY031033/National Eye Institute (US)
- D43TW012027/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
- L60 EY034352/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 EY007003/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- K12 EY022299/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- NIGMS K12GM111725/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 EY031033/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
