Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 11;410(1):3.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03564-w.

Prognostic impact of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

Affiliations

Prognostic impact of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

Jun Yoshino et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with peripheral type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. Although LND is usually performed for perihilar type ICC, there is no consensus on whether routine LND should be performed for peripheral type ICC. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of LND in patients who underwent hepatectomy for peripheral type ICC.

Methods: This study included consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically curative initial hepatectomy for ICC at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Among them, peripheral type ICCs with the macroscopic appearance of mass-forming (MF) or MF + periductal infiltrating (PI) types were analyzed. Propensity score analyses (1:1 matching and inverse probability treatment weighting) were adopted to adjust confounding variables. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the LND and no LND (NLND) groups.

Results: During the study period, 201 patients underwent hepatectomy for ICC. The number of peripheral ICC patients with MF type or MF + PI type was 142. The LND group comprised 94 patients and the NLND group comprised 48 patients. The N1 group showed significantly poorer OS and DFS than the N0 and NLND groups (P < 0.001). After propensity score adjustment, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between the LND and NLND groups.

Conclusions: The prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis was significant; however, the therapeutic effect of LND was not demonstrated in peripheral type ICC. The indication of LND should be carefully considered on an individual patient basis.

Keywords: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW); Lymph node dissection; Lymph node metastasis; Propensity score analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Razumilava N, Gores GJ (2014) Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 383:2168–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61903-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Uchiyama K, Yamamoto M, Yamaue H et al (2011) Impact of nodal involvement on surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the study group for hepatic surgery of the japanese society of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0349-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T et al (2013) Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2331-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Matsuyama Y et al (2016) Proposal of a new staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of surgical patients from a nationwide survey of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Cancer 122:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29686 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources