Intraoperative surgical navigation improves margin status in advanced malignancies of the anterior craniofacial area: A prospective observational study with systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Abstract

The current scientific evidence suggests that surgical navigation (SN) can contribute to improve oncologic outcomes in sinonasal and craniofacial surgery. The present study investigated the feasibility of intraoperative SN and its role in improving the outcomes of surgically treated sinonasal and craniofacial tumors. This prospective study compared navigation-guided surgery for sinonasal or craniofacial malignancies with a pair-matched cohort (1:2 matching) of patients operated without SN. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Thirty-five patients who underwent navigation-guided surgery were included. The pair-matched control cohort included 70 patients operated without SN. The margin status analysis demonstrated a lower rate of positive margins (p = 0.013) in the SN group, especially in pT4 (p = 0.034), recurrent (p = 0.024), high-grade tumors (p = 0.043), and endoscopic-assisted open surgery (p = 0.035). The mean preoperative time did not show a significant difference between surgeries performed with or without SN (1.26 vs. 1.23 h, p = 0.445). However, surgeries utilizing SN had a significantly longer median duration compared to those without (8.10 vs. 6.00 h, p = 0.029). A total of 209 patients were included in the meta-analysis; 91 patients (43.5 %) underwent surgery with SN. The results of the meta-analysis showed an improvement in terms of negative margins rate with the use of SN (OR = 2.62; 95%-confidence interval: 1.33-5.17). In conclusion, intraoperative SN can contribute to achieve a clear margin resection, especially in locally advanced tumors, recurrences, highly aggressive histologies, and when endoscopic-assisted open surgery is employed.

Keywords: Computer-assisted; Head and neck cancer; Margin; Navigation; Precision medicine; Skull base; Surgery.