Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;9(12):104002.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review

Affiliations

Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review

J Delahousse et al. ESMO Open. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: In addition to the effect of body weight, a patient's sex can influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer agents, and thereby their activity and safety. The magnitude and relevance of sex differences, however, are currently unclear.

Methods: We carried out a systematic review of published studies (clinical, n ≥ 10) on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (on 31 January 2022) anticancer drugs (excluding hormonal agents), aiming to identify significant PK differences between male and female patients. A difference of ≥20% on PK parameters (clearance or trough concentration) was considered significant. The methodological quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA2020 guidelines and a previously published protocol, which was registered in the PROSPERO database (number 291008).

Results: Data on 99 anticancer agents (for a total of 1643 abstracts and European Medicines Agency/FDA documents) were screened. The final dataset included 112 articles and 8 European Medicines Agency/FDA documents. The median size of a study cohort was 445 patients (range: 12-6468 patients). Significant PK differences (>+20% in clearance or apparent clearance in women) were identified for 14 drugs, and potentially significant PK differences (due to conflicting reports) for another 8 drugs. None of the studies included sex-based summaries to assess whether the observed differences in PK may impact the efficacy or safety profile.

Conclusions: Significant sex differences in PK have been identified including commonly used drugs of different classes, such as 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, regorafenib, atezolizumab, and temozolomide. The risk-benefit ratio for such anticancer drugs is likely to be improved by the development of sex-specific dosing strategies. Additional sex-based PK-pharmacodynamic analyses are recommended during dose optimisation and are to be conducted in line with the FDA Project Optimus guidance. They should be reported even if no association between the patients' sex and the activity and/or toxicity of an anticancer drug has been identified.

Keywords: antineoplastic agents; gender medicine; pharmacokinetics; population pharmacokinetics; sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram. EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; IRB, institutional review board.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of factors potentially influencing the variability in drug responses. Both biological sex and gender, as well as age are overarching factors, with potential influence on drug responses on different levels.

References

    1. Felici A., Verweij J., Sparreboom A. Dosing strategies for anticancer drugs: the good, the bad and body-surface area. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(13):1677–1684. - PubMed
    1. Jackson S.S., Marks M.A., Katki H.A., et al. Sex disparities in the incidence of 21 cancer types: quantification of the contribution of risk factors. Cancer. 2022;128(19):3531–3540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Özdemir B.C., Csajka C., Dotto G.P., Wagner A.D. Sex differences in efficacy and toxicity of systemic treatments: an undervalued issue in the era of precision oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(26):2680–2683. - PubMed
    1. Gotay C.C., Phillips P.H., Cheson B.D. Male–female differences in the impact of cancer therapy. Oncology (Williston Park) 1993;7(2):67–74. discussion 74, 77. - PubMed
    1. Arciero V., McDonald E., Nguyen V., et al. Do female and male patients derive similar benefits from approved systemic oncology therapies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(8):4215–4224. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances