Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug 26;10(4):491-498.
doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003705.

Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dual antiplatelet versus alteplase in anterior and posterior circulation minor stroke

Yu Cui et al. Stroke Vasc Neurol. .

Abstract

Objective: The Antiplatelet versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischaemic Stroke trial has demonstrated the non-inferiority of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to alteplase in minor non-disabling stroke. This prespecified secondary analysis aimed to investigate whether the treatment effects were similar across stroke territories.

Methods: Participants were divided according to stroke territory, which were subdivided into DAPT and alteplase. An excellent functional outcome at 90 days defined as modified Rankin Scale scoring 0-1 was primary outcome. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change and early neurological improvement measured by a 2-point decline in NIHSS score at 24 hours were secondary outcomes. Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) and bleeding events were safety outcomes. Primary analyses adjusted unbalanced baseline characteristics between treatments by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: A total of 719 patients were included: 566 in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and 153 in posterior circulation stroke (PCS). Primary outcome was 94.1% in DAPT and 91.7% in alteplase among ACS patients (adjusted risk difference (RD) and 95% CI, 1.5% (-1.5% to 4.6%), p=0.32), while 91.2% in DAPT and 91.8% in alteplase among PCS patients (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -2.1% (-8.5% to 4.4%), p=0.53). Compared with alteplase, DAPT was associated with lower risk of sICH (p=0.03) and bleeding events (p<0.001) in ACS, but only lower risk of bleeding events (p=0.007) in PCS. Additionally, among ACS patients, the alteplase was superior to DAPT in terms of decrease in NIHSS score at 24 hours compared with admission (adjusted geometric mean ratio and 95% CI, -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.03), p=0.005) and early neurological improvement (adjusted RD and 95% CI, -7.2% (-11.6% to -2.7%), p=0.001).

Conclusion: Among ischaemic stroke with minor non-disabling symptoms, DAPT was similar with intravenous alteplase regarding long-term functional outcome and better safety regardless of ACS or PCS. The potential benefit of intravenous alteplase regarding early neurological improvement in patients with ACS warrants further investigation.

Trial registration number: NCT03661411.

Keywords: Cerebrovascular Circulation; Ischemic Stroke; Stroke; Thrombolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart. ACS, anterior circulation stroke; ARAMIS, the Antiplatelet versus R-tPA for Acute Mild Ischaemic Stroke trial; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; PCS, posterior circulation stroke.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Scores ranged from 0 to 6. 0=no symptoms, 1=symptoms without clinically significant disability, 2=slight disability, 3=moderate disability, 4=moderately severe disability, 5=severe disability and 6=death. ACS, anterior circulation stroke; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; PCS, posterior circulation stroke.

References

    1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50:e344–418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J . 2021;6:I–LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Chen W, Zhou H, et al. Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of clinical management of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5:159–76. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saber H, Saver JL. Distributional Validity and Prognostic Power of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in US Administrative Claims Data. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:606–12. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.5061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiong Y, Gu H, Zhao X-Q, et al. Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Varying Definitions of Minor Stroke: From a Large-Scale Nation-Wide Longitudinal Registry. Stroke. 2021;52:1253–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031329. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data