Combined anterior-posterior versus posterior only approach for surgical management of adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
- PMID: 39663228
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08600-3
Combined anterior-posterior versus posterior only approach for surgical management of adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the clinical outcomes and complication rates for fusion procedures of adult spinal deformity (ASD) performed via an anterior-posterior approach as compared to a posterior-only approach to guide surgical decision-making. Numerous surgical techniques exist for operative management of ASD; however, no systematic review and meta-analysis exists comparing combined anterior-posterior approaches to posterior-only approach, despite significant interest in the current literature.
Methods: Four databases were used to collect articles from database inception until September 9th, 2023. Inclusion criteria was articles that examined both anterior-posterior or posterior only surgical approach, adult patients, comparative studies, and articles in English.
Results: Seven comparative articles met the inclusion criteria. Included patients had a frequency weighted (FW) mean age of 60.2 ± 5.1 years and a FW mean follow-up of 40.4 ± 12.5 months. Qualitative data did not favor either group in terms of length of stay, radiographic outcomes, or functional outcomes. There was a total of 306 complications in the Anterior-Posterior group with a complication rate per patient of 1.0 ± 0.9 complications whereas there was a total of 380 complications in the Posterior Only group with a complication rate per patient of 1.0 ± 1.2 complications. Meta-analysis of specific complications found no significant difference in revision rate, dural tear rate, neurological complication rate, infection rate, or pseudoarthrosis rate.
Conclusion: Surgical management for ASD may provide comparable results in terms of surgical parameters, radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates, irrespective of surgical approach.
Keywords: Adult scoliosis; Adult spinal deformity; Combined anterior-posterior approach; Orthopedics; Posterior-only.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: ATA receives consulting fees from QPIX.
References
-
- Safaee MM, Ames CP, Smith JS (2020) Epidemiology and socioeconomic trends in adult spinal deformity care. Neurosurgery 87:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz454 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG et al (2022) Adult spinal deformity: a comprehensive review of current advances and future directions. Asian Spine J 16:776–788. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0376 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG et al (2020) Adult spinal deformity: current concepts and decision-making strategies for management. Asian Spine J 14:886–897. https://doi.org/10.31616/ASJ.2020.0568 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Joseph SA, Moreno AP, Brandoff J et al (2009) Sagittal plane deformity in the adult patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:378–388. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200906000-00006 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Akintürk N, Zileli M, Yaman O (2022) Complications of adult spinal deformity surgery: a literature review. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 13:17–26. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_159_21 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources