Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov;328(1):334-349.
doi: 10.1111/imr.13427. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Fc Effector Function of Immune Checkpoint Blocking Antibodies in Oncology

Affiliations
Review

Fc Effector Function of Immune Checkpoint Blocking Antibodies in Oncology

Romane Martineau et al. Immunol Rev. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Antagonistic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting inhibitory immune checkpoints have revolutionized the field of oncology. CTLA-4, PD-1, and LAG3 are three co-inhibitory receptors, which can be expressed by subsets of T cells and which play a role in the regulation of adaptive immune responses. Blocking these immune checkpoints receptors (or their ligands) with antagonistic antibodies can lead to tumor regressions and lasting remissions in some patients with cancer. Two anti-CTLA4, six anti-PD1, three anti-PD-L1, and one anti-LAG3 antibodies are currently approved by the FDA and EMA. Their mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy are linked to their affinity with Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) (so called "effector functions"). The anti-CTLA-4 antibodies ipilimumab (IgG1) and tremilimumab (IgG2a), and the anti-PD-L1 avelumab (IgG1) have isotypes with high affinity for activating FcγR and thereby can induce ADCC/ADCP. The effector function is required for the in vivo efficacy of anti-CTLA4 antibodies. For anti-PD(L)1 antibodies, where a pure antagonistic function ("checkpoint blockade") is sufficient, some mAbs are IgG1 but have been mutated in their Fc sequence (e.g., durvalumab and atezolizumab) or are IgG4 (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab) to have low affinity for FcγR. Here, we review the impact of FcγR effector function on immune checkpoint blockers safety and efficacy in oncology.

Keywords: FcγR; immune checkpoint; monoclonal antibody.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mechanisms of action of monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints by antagonism or via their effector functions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Biological impact of anti‐CTLA4 treatment on tumoral microenvironment.

References

    1. Miller R. A., Maloney D. G., Warnke R., and Levy R., “Treatment of B‐Cell Lymphoma With Monoclonal Anti‐Idiotype Antibody,” New England Journal of Medicine 306, no. 9 (1982): 517–522, 10.1056/NEJM198203043060906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. FDA , “Rituxan, Rituximab,” https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/1997/ritugen112697‐....
    1. Maloney D. G., Grillo‐López A. J., White C. A., et al., “IDEC‐C2B8 (Rituximab) Anti‐CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Patients With Relapsed Low‐Grade Non‐Hodgkin's Lymphoma,” Blood 90, no. 6 (1997): 2188–2195. - PubMed
    1. Shekarian T., Valsesia‐Wittmann S., Caux C., and Marabelle A., “Paradigm Shift in Oncology: Targeting the Immune System Rather Than cancer Cells,” Mutagenesis 30, no. 2 (2015): 205–211, 10.1093/mutage/geu073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodi F. S., Mihm M. C., Soiffer R. J., et al., “Biologic Activity of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte‐Associated Antigen 4 Antibody Blockade in Previously Vaccinated Metastatic Melanoma and Ovarian Carcinoma Patients,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, no. 8 (2003): 4712–4717, 10.1073/pnas.0830997100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms