Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Dec 10;17(5):17585732241297152.
doi: 10.1177/17585732241297152. Online ahead of print.

Revision radiocapitellar arthroplasty by mismatched implant components - A salvage option: A report of two cases with a minimum three-year follow-up

Affiliations
Case Reports

Revision radiocapitellar arthroplasty by mismatched implant components - A salvage option: A report of two cases with a minimum three-year follow-up

Tiago Martinho et al. Shoulder Elbow. .

Abstract

Radiocapitellar arthroplasty has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with a degenerative joint. Due to problems with the loosening of the radial head component, one of the few available systems was removed from the global market. This offered specific challenges in terms of treatment strategies when one or both components of a system that is no longer available fail. Due to the very different geometry of the capitellar implant, revision of the capitellar component would require a complex procedure, likely requiring bone graft and a high chance of early failure, leaving resection or interposition arthroplasty as the only available option. Although implant mismatch is common practice in hip and knee arthroplasty with satisfactory results, it should remain a salvage option as the off-label use of components gives rise to several medicolegal implications. We report two cases of radiocapitellar arthroplasty partial revision, by replacing only the radial head component with an implant from another system while keeping the well-fixed original capitellar component in place. At a minimum of three-year follow-up, both cases improved from poor to good and excellent Mayo elbow performance scores. There were no signs of implant failure on standard radiographs.

Keywords: Radial head arthroplasty; elbow; osteoarthritis; radial head prosthesis; radial head replacement; revision radial head arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A declaration form must be submitted for all types of manuscripts. Shoulder & Elbow operates a double-blind peer review process, so please do not include names of any authors or institutions in this form as it will be seen by peer reviewers. The Shoulder & Elbow declaration policy document provides options for many of the declarations below. Please find this in the journal submission guidelines on the journal website.

References

    1. Lim YW, van Riet RP, Mittal R, et al. Pattern of osteophyte distribution in primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 963–966. - PubMed
    1. Ahrens PM, Redfern DR, Forester AJ. Patterns of articular wear in the cadaveric elbow joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 52–56. - PubMed
    1. Ravalli S, Pulici C, Binetti S, et al. An overview of the pathogenesis and treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2019; 4: 30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kachooei AR, Baradaran A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, et al. The rate of radial head prosthesis removal or revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43: 39–53.e31. - PubMed
    1. Momtaz D, Ahmad F, Cushing T, et al. Radiocapitellar arthroplasty: systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2023; 7: 24715492231152735. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources