Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories
- PMID: 39664638
- PMCID: PMC11633235
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241
Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories
Abstract
Research on flashbulb memories (FBMs) has primarily focused on cognitive aspects. However, recent studies indicate that FBMs are closely associated with social and cultural dynamics. This descriptive study explored the structural aspects and psychosocial functions of negative FBMs within the context of intergroup theories, mainly focusing on negative public (coup attempt in Türkiye on July 15, 2016) and private (bad news of a loved one) FBMs. Participants in the main study (N = 233) were selected and grouped based on their social dominance orientations (SDO; high and low groups) and system justification tendencies (SJT; high and low groups), using data from a preliminary survey (N = 1,113). In the main study, participants' responses to items on canonical categories, phenomenological aspects, and psychosocial functions of FBMs and their involvement in different protest actions against the coup attempt were compared considering SDO, SJT, and gender. The results show that private FBMs were generally rated higher by participants than public FBMs in all aspects. Although the canonical quality of private FBM did not differ between gender groups, public FBM quality was better in men. Participants in the high-SJT group had higher-quality public FBMs and rated these memories as more functional than participants in the low-SJT group, along with their high levels of protest participation. No differences were observed between the SDO groups for either type of FBM. The findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to group hierarchies and system justification motives. As the first attempt to place the FBM phenomenon in the context of SDO and SJT at the individual level, this study is intended to encourage others to adopt multi-level intergroup theories for integrating bottom-up and top-down processes.
Keywords: canonical category of flashbulb memory; flashbulb memory; gender differences in flashbulb memory; group hierarchies; phenomenological aspects of flashbulb memory; psychosocial functions flashbulb memory; social dominance orientation; system justification tendency.
Copyright © 2024 Çavuşoğlu and Kuşdil.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Flashbulb and first-hand memories for campus closings due to COVID-19: consistency and change.Memory. 2024 Sep 18:1-16. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2404499. Online ahead of print. Memory. 2024. PMID: 39292877
-
Michael Jackson, Bin Laden and I: functions of positive and negative, public and private flashbulb memories.Memory. 2015;23(4):487-506. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.907428. Epub 2014 Apr 23. Memory. 2015. PMID: 24758437
-
Flashbulb Memories.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb 1;25(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/0963721415622487. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 26997762 Free PMC article.
-
Flashbulb memories.Curr Opin Psychol. 2025 Oct;65:102079. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102079. Epub 2025 Jun 23. Curr Opin Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40602013 Review.
-
Flashbulb memories and other repetitive images: a psychiatric perspective.Compr Psychiatry. 1999 Mar-Apr;40(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90115-3. Compr Psychiatry. 1999. PMID: 10080258 Review.
References
-
- Berntsen D. (2018). “Flashbulb memory and social identity” in Flashbulb memories: New challenges and future perspectives. eds. Luminet O., Curci A. (New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 112–134.
-
- Bluck S., Alea N., Habermas T., Rubin D. C. (2005). A tale of three functions: the self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Soc. Cogn. 23, 91–117. doi: 10.1521/soco.23.1.91.59198 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials