Cognitive considerations for adults with sickle cell disease completing the brief pain inventory
- PMID: 39664708
- PMCID: PMC11631029
- DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001189
Cognitive considerations for adults with sickle cell disease completing the brief pain inventory
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate assessment of pain severity is important for caring for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The Brief Pain Inventory was developed to address limitations of previous pain-rating metrics and is available in a short form (BPI-SF). However, the BPI-SF is a self-report scale dependent on patient comprehension and interpretation of items.
Objective: To examine patterns in how patients completed the BPI-SF and determine whether incorrectly completing the BPI-SF was related to cognitive functioning or education.
Methods: A secondary analysis was completed using data from a study examining brain aging and cognitive impairment in SCD. T-tests were performed to examine whether neurocognitive function (immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial skills, attention, and language), word reading, and years of education differed based on correct BPI-SF completion.
Results: The sample (n = 71) was 43.7% male, 98.6% African American or mixed race. Of that, 53.5% had sickle cell anemia, and the mean years of education was 13.6. Overall, 21.1% of participants (n = 15) incorrectly completed the BPI-SF pain severity items, and 57.7% completed the body map item incorrectly. Those who completed the severity items incorrectly had statistically significant differences in education. Group differences in neurocognitive function were no longer significant after familywise error rates were controlled for. Literacy was not associated with error rates.
Conclusion: Education level may influence patients' ability to correctly complete the BPI-SF. Findings suggest that careful consideration is warranted for use of the BPI in patients with SCD. Recommended revisions to the BPI include simplifying the language, shortening sentence length, and clearly specifying the timeframes.
Keywords: Measurement; Pain; Sickle cell anemia; Sickle cell disease.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. C.R.J. reports being a co-founder, Chief Executive Officer, and holding equity in Expressive Painimation Co., a company that develops pain assessment technology.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
References
-
- Ali JS, Andrasik F, Berlin KS, Porter J, Hankins J, Anderson S, Schreiber JE. Attention difficulties are associated with lower engagement in adult care amongst youth with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2020;189:e27–30. - PubMed
-
- Ampomah MA, Drake JA, Anum A, Amponsah B, Dei‐Adomakoh Y, Anie K, Mate‐Kole CC, Jonassaint CR, Kirkham FJ. A case‐control and seven‐year longitudinal neurocognitive study of adults with sickle cell disease in Ghana. Br J Haematol 2022;199:411–26. - PubMed
-
- Ballas SK, Darbari DS. Review/overview of pain in sickle cell disease. Complement Ther Med 2020;49:102327. - PubMed
-
- Beauregard L, Pomp A, Choinière M. Severity and impact of pain after day-surgery. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:304–11. - PubMed
-
- Beck SL, Falkson G. Prevalence and management of cancer pain in South Africa. PAIN 2001;94:75–84. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources