Effectiveness of robot-assisted training in adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39666104
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12798-z
Effectiveness of robot-assisted training in adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: This work aimed to update and summarize the existing evidence on the effectiveness of robot-assisted training (RAT) in adults with Parkinson's disease (PD).
Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022371124). Seven databases and two trial registries were searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) addressing RAT alone or in addition to other treatments in adults with PD up to January 2024. Primary outcomes were disease-specific motor impairment, balance, mobility, freezing of gait, falls, number of people who fell at least once, and adverse events. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. Risk of bias (RoB) and certainty of the evidence for the primary outcomes were assessed using the Cochrane RoB Tool and the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, respectively.
Results: Fifteen RCTs (629 randomized adults with PD) were included. Our results show that the evidence is very uncertain about the effectiveness of any kind of RAT, either focused on gait, balance or upper limb impairment, compared to any comparator (treadmill training, overground gait training, exercises without the exoskeleton, conventional physical therapy, balance training, and no treatment), mainly because of RoB, inconsistency in individual studies results, and very limited number (less than 200) of participants considered in each comparison.
Conclusion: In light of the aforementioned very low certainty evidence, clinical considerations should be drawn very carefully. High-quality studies are thus highly needed to investigate potential benefits, risks, and cost/benefit ratio of RAT in adults with PD.
Keywords: Gait; Meta-analysis; Parkinson's disease; Robot-assisted training; Systematic review; Upper extremity.
© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests to declare.
References
-
- Collaborators GBDPsD (2018) Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 17:939–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3 - DOI
-
- Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD (2014) The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord 29:1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25945 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Jankovic J (2008) Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Poewe W, Seppi K, Tanner CM, Halliday GM, Brundin P, Volkmann J, Schrag AE, Lang AE (2017) Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.13 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
