Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 12;4(12):e0003961.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003961. eCollection 2024.

Using knowledge translation to support the use of evaluation findings: A case study of the linda mama free maternity program in Kenya

Fatuma H Guleid  1 , Stacey Orangi  1 , Angela Kairu  1 , Brian Arwa  1 , Janet Keru  2 , Anne Musuva  2 , Ileana Vilcu  3 , Anooj Pattnaik  4 , Nirmala Ravishankar  5 , Edwine Barasa  1   6
Affiliations

Using knowledge translation to support the use of evaluation findings: A case study of the linda mama free maternity program in Kenya

Fatuma H Guleid et al. PLOS Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Using program evaluation findings is crucial in improving health programs and realising the program's benefits. In this article, we report on how a knowledge translation (KT) approach supported the use of evaluation findings to improve the Linda Mama free maternity program in Kenya. We used a case study design employing qualitative approaches to describe our KT strategy and its impact on evaluation use. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews of participants (n = 25) in three Kenyan counties following dissemination of the evaluation findings and co-production of action plans based on the evaluation. The findings suggest modest improvements in the implementation of Linda Mama in 3 Kenyan counties facilitated by application of the evaluation findings. However, these improvements were not uniform across and within the counties. Challenges such as the COVID-19 restrictions, lack of infrastructure and delayed reimbursement of funds hindered the full implementation of the action plans. The KT strategy was a key facilitator for the improvements. The dissemination and deliberation workshops provided learning spaces for stakeholders, ensuring that each perspective was considered. The participatory method used in developing the action plans also improved communication between stakeholder groups. Participants reported that this approach made aware them of the gaps in implementation and motivated them to realise the full potential of the Linda Mama program. Using KT, especially when evaluating and refining the implementation of complex health programs with multiple stakeholders, is useful in improving the uptake of evaluation findings. However, it can be challenging to sustain such engagement with stakeholders. In addition, contextual factors that affect uptake need to be considered and navigated. Finally, significant investment (both in human resource and financial) in such approaches is required if KT is to be successful.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The study’s iKT approach.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Timeline of the project.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Preskill H, Zuckerman B, Matthews B. An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for future research. American journal of evaluation. 2003;24(4):423–42.
    1. Alkin MC, Taut SM. Unbundling evaluation use. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2002;29(1):1–12.
    1. Shulha LM, Cousins JB. Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation practice. 1997;18(3):195–208.
    1. Pattyn V, Bouterse M. Explaining use and non-use of policy evaluations in a mature evaluation setting. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2020;7(1):1–9.
    1. Johnson K, Greenseid LO, Toal SA, King JA, Lawrenz F, Volkov B. Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American journal of evaluation. 2009;30(3):377–410.

LinkOut - more resources