Evaluation of the German living guideline "Protection against the Overuse and Underuse of Health Care" - an online survey among German GPs
- PMID: 39668346
- PMCID: PMC11636051
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02657-1
Evaluation of the German living guideline "Protection against the Overuse and Underuse of Health Care" - an online survey among German GPs
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness and use of the German guideline "Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care" from the general practitioners' (GPs') perspective. In addition, the study assessed how GPs perceive medical overuse and what solutions they have for reducing it.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional online survey with recruitment from 15.06. to 31.07.2023. Participants were members of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM). The main outcomes were the awareness and use of the guideline.
Results: The analysis included data from 626 physicians. 51% were female and the median age was 50 years. The guideline is known by 81% of the participants, 32% read it in more detail. The majority considered the guideline a helpful tool in reducing overuse (67%). Almost 90% wished to have more guidelines with clear do-not-do recommendations. Physicians indicated in mean (M) that 30.2% (SD = 19.3%) of patients ask them for medical services that they do not consider to be necessary and that M = 30.2% (SD = 18.1%) of all GP services can be attributed to medical overuse. About half of the participants thought that overuse is a moderate or major problem in their practice (52%) and in general practice overall (58%). More participants rated that it is especially a problem in specialist (87%) and inpatient care (82%). Changes in the reimbursement system, raising awareness for the problem and more evidence-based guidelines were considered helpful in mitigating overuse.
Conclusions: Although the guideline is seen as a useful tool in mitigating medical overuse, there is still further potential for its implementation and utilisation. GPs see more overuse in the inpatient and outpatient specialist areas than in their area of practice. Instead of self-critically approaching the problem, the proposed strategies are aimed at the healthcare system itself.
Keywords: Guidelines; Overdiagnosis; Overuse; Primary care.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval statement and consent to participate: The Ethics Committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg approved the study (23–161-S, 08.05.2023). Participants gave their informed consent to participate. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Protection against the overuse and underuse of health care - methodological considerations for establishing prioritization criteria and recommendations in general practice.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3569-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30305090 Free PMC article.
-
Higher interest to continue COVID-19 practice recommendations in non-pandemic times among German GPs with better crisis leadership skills (egePan study).BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11855-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39538285 Free PMC article.
-
Medical overuse and quaternary prevention in primary care - A qualitative study with general practitioners.BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0667-4. BMC Fam Pract. 2017. PMID: 29216841 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to guidelines when evaluating fitness-to-drive in the elderly: a practice review of Swiss physicians.Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul 9;148:w14632. doi: 10.57187/smw.2018.14632. eCollection 2018. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018. PMID: 30044469 Review.
-
Evaluating clinical guidelines for chronic disease management: Do they enable the personalization of care?Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.023. Epub 2024 Dec 8. Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39652981
References
-
- Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. Jama 1998;280(11):1000–5. 10.1001/jama.280.11.1000 - PubMed
-
- Brodersen J, Schwartz LM, Heneghan C, et al. Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(1):1–3. 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110886. - PubMed
-
- Blair JM, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, et al. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(1):42–51. 10.1038/nrmicro3380. - PubMed
-
- Kühlein T, Macdonald H, Kramer B, et al. Overdiagnosis and too much medicine in a world of crises. BMJ. 2023;382: p1865. 10.1136/bmj.p1865. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources