Toward person-centred measures of contraceptive demand: a systematic review of the relationship between intentions to use and actual use of contraception
- PMID: 39669095
- PMCID: PMC11634881
- DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15078.3
Toward person-centred measures of contraceptive demand: a systematic review of the relationship between intentions to use and actual use of contraception
Abstract
Background: Understanding people's interest in using modern contraception is critical to ensuring programs align with people's preferences and needs. Current measures of demand for contraception are misinterpreted. More direct measures of intention to use (ITU) contraception do exist but remain underexplored. This systematic review examines the relationship between intention to use and actual use of contraception.
Methods: We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Collaboration to identify studies published from 1975-2020 that: (1) examined contraceptive behaviour, (2) included measures of ITU and future contraceptive use, and (3) included at least one quantitative measure of association between ITU and actual use. The inclusion criteria were: 1) examined contraceptive behaviour (excluding condom use only), (2) included disaggregated integral measures of ITU contraceptives and later contraceptive use, (3) included at least one quantitative measure of the association between ITU contraceptives and actual contraceptive use, (4) study population was women of reproductive age, (5) were peer-reviewed, and (6) written in English.
Results: 10 prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria; these provided 28,749 person-years of data (N=10,925). Although we could pool the data for unadjusted odds ratios, a metanalysis was not possible. We calculated that 6 of the 10 studies indicated significant, increased, unadjusted odds of subsequent contraceptive use after reporting ITU. Of those, 3 study analyses reported significant, positive adjusted odds ratios for the relationship between intention to use and later contraceptive use across varying covariates. The range of confounding factors, particularly around sub-populations, points to the need for more research so that a meta-analysis can be done in the future.
Conclusions: People's self-reported ITU contraception has the potential to be a strong predictor of subsequent contraceptive use. Few studies directly examined the relationship between ITU and contraceptive uptake and recruitment was primarily pregnant or postpartum samples.
Keywords: Systematic review; contraception; intention; preferences.
Copyright: © 2025 Boydell V et al.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing interests were disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 09;(8):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub3. PMID: 23440846 Updated.
-
Inequality in modern contraceptive use and unmet need for contraception among women of reproductive age in Zambia. A trend and decomposition analysis 2007-2018.Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 9;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01909-8. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39654062 Free PMC article.
-
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 30;3(3):CD012025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012025.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27027480 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 15;5:CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub3. PMID: 36622724 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Theory-based interventions for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27879980 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Westoff CF, Ochoa LH: Unmet need and the demand for family planning.Institute for Resource Development; Columbia, MD: DHS Comparative Studies No. 5.1991.
-
- Bradley SEK, Croft TN, Fishel JD, et al. : Revising unmet need for family planning.ICF International; Calverton, MD. DHS Analytical Studies No. 2.2012. Reference Source
-
- Measure Evaluation: Family planning and reproductive health indicators database. 2020; March 31st, 2021. Reference Source
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous