Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II
- PMID: 39670880
- PMCID: PMC12344096
- DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irae208
Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II
Abstract
Severe burn injury poses significant clinical challenges, often necessitating the use of vasoactive agents to maintain perfusion. This narrative review explores the current landscape of vasoactive agents in acute burn shock resuscitation and in severe burn-injured patients who develop septic shock, with a particular focus on the potential role of the novel vasoactive agent, synthetic angiotensin-II (AT-II), in these settings. While catecholamines and vasopressin remain cornerstone therapies, adverse effects, variable patient responses, and a new understanding of burn injury pathophysiology highlight the potentially evolving role of vasoactive agents in these clinical scenarios. A key system involved in blood pressure regulation, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, is often dysregulated in acute burn and septic shock. Contributory mechanisms and potential benefits of synthetic AT-II are discussed here and form the physiologic rationale behind the exogenous administration of synthetic AT-II in the context of available safety and efficacy data. To date, administration of synthetic AT-II has shown promise in improving hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in distributive shock populations; however, data in acute burn shock and in burn patients who develop septic shock are lacking. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the potential and future areas of research in burn shock and severe burn-injured patients is provided.
Keywords: angiotensin-II; burn shock; renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; septic shock; vasopressors.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association.
Conflict of interest statement
S.W.M. has received research funding and/or consulting fees from Shionogi, Inc., and Vericel, Inc. N.T. has received consulting fees from Shionogi, Inc. K.D.B. and M.S.B. are employees of Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics. J.S. is on the American Burn Association Board of Trustees and JBCR Editor, but is blinded and recused of this work. D.M.H. has received research funding and/or consulting fees for Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Access Pro Medical, Trevena, Inc., Medline Industries, LP, and Shionogi, Inc. All other others have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Accessed December 8, 2024. https://ameriburn.org/resources/burn-incidence-fact-sheet
-
- Sheppard NN, Hemington-Gorse S, Shelley OP, Philp B, Dziewulski P. Prognostic scoring systems in burns: a review. Burns. 2011;37:1288–1295. - PubMed
-
- Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726–1734. - PubMed
-
- Adibfar A, Camacho F, Rogers AD, Cartotto R. The use of vasopressors during acute burn resuscitation. Burns. 2021;47:58–66. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
