Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 13:26:e55429.
doi: 10.2196/55429.

Personalized Mobile App-Based Program for Preparation and Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Evidence for Improved Outcomes From a Prospective Nonrandomized Study

Affiliations

Personalized Mobile App-Based Program for Preparation and Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Evidence for Improved Outcomes From a Prospective Nonrandomized Study

Alberto Martini et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: eHealth can help replicate the benefits of conventional surgical prehabilitation programs and overcome organizational constraints related to human resources and health care-related costs.

Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of an optimized perioperative program using a personalized mobile app designed for preparation and recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods: We report on a series of 122 consecutive robot-assisted RP before and after the implementation of the betty.care app (cohort A: standard of care, n=60; cohort B: optimized program, n=62). The primary end point was continence recovery, defined as "0 or 1 safety pad per day" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary end points were length of stay, same-day discharge, complications, readmissions, and number of days alive and out of hospital within 30 days from surgery.

Results: Both cohorts were comparable in terms of age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and disease aggressiveness. Intraoperative parameters (lymph node dissection, operative time, and bilateral nerve-sparing surgery) were comparable in both groups, except for blood loss, which was significantly higher in cohort B (182 vs 125 cc; P=.008). The 6-week continence rate was improved in cohort B in both univariable and multivariable analyses (92% vs 75%; P=.01). There were trends favoring cohort B for all secondary end points with a minimal 30% benefit compared with cohort A. Grade 2 or more complications occurred less frequently in cohort B (13% vs 3.2%; P=.042). Same-day discharge and readmission rates were 35% and 53% (P=.043), and 3.3% and 1.6% (P=.54) in cohorts A and B, respectively. Mean length of stay was reduced by 0.2 days in cohort B (0.58 vs 0.78 days; P=.10). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.

Conclusions: The implementation of a mobile app that provides a holistic approach to the perioperative period, integrating prehabilitation, rehabilitation, and remote monitoring, could lead to the improvement of important functional outcomes after RP and could replicate an on-site prehabilitation program. Multicenter validation is needed.

Keywords: app; betty.care app; cohort; continence; eHealth; electronic health; health care; human resource; implementation; mHealth; mobile app; mobile health; perioperative; prehabilitation; radical prostatectomy; rehabilitation; robot, outcomes; single-surgeon; surgical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: AM and GP have own shares of Oltre Medical Consulting, LLC. JBB and GP have own shares of AIMED2, LLC.

References

    1. Baltaxe E, Hsieh HW, Roca J, Cano I. The assessment of medical device software supporting health care services for chronic patients in a tertiary hospital: overarching study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e40976. doi: 10.2196/40976.v25i1e40976 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang T, Stanforth PR, Fleming RYD, Wolf J Stuart, Stanforth D, Tanaka H. A mobile app with multimodality prehabilitation programs for patients awaiting elective surgery: development and usability study. JMIR Perioper Med. 2021;4(2):e32575. doi: 10.2196/32575. https://periop.jmir.org/2021/2/e32575/ v4i2e32575 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, Pruthi RS, Thalmann GN, Desai M. Enhanced recovery after urological surgery: a contemporary systematic review of outcomes, key elements, and research needs. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26970912 S0302-2838(16)00241-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630–641. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8.S0002961002008668 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh F, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Spry N, Baker MK. A systematic review of pre-surgical exercise intervention studies with cancer patients. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(2):92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.01.004.S0960-7404(13)00018-2 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources