Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb:305:92-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

Efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first trimester missed abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first trimester missed abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kanwal Majeed et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Missed abortion in the first trimester is characterized by the cessation of embryonic or fetal development while the cervix remains closed, often resulting in little to no bleeding. Ultrasound examinations typically reveal an empty gestational sac or an embryo/fetus that lacks cardiac activity. Misoprostol is the primary medication used to manage early pregnancy loss.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of misoprostol, orally and vaginally in management of first trimester missed abortion."

Study selection: This systematic review included randomised control trials of patients with a confirmed diagnosis with first-trimester missed abortion, comparing oral and vaginal misoprostol for uterine evacuation success, induction-expulsion time, patient satisfaction and adverse events.

Data extraction and analysis: Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. All of them are RCTs with a number of patients 1,142 [578 in oral misoprostol group and 564 in vaginal misoprostol group]. Independent data extraction and quality assessment ensured unbiased results. We estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs using random-effects meta-analysis and evaluated quality of the included studies using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

Results: We included 10 studies in our analysis and for our primary outcome, vaginal misoprostol had a higher success rate, [RR: 0.85, P = 0.004], shorter induction-expulsion interval [MD:4.95, P = 0.0001], and greater patient satisfaction compared to oral administration [RR:0.85, P = 0.01]. Secondary outcomes revealed significantly higher nausea and vomiting in the oral group, with no significant difference in headache, dizziness, diarrhea, fever, excessive bleeding, or discharge. Severe crampy pain was also significantly higher in the oral group.

Conclusion: Our comprehensive review and meta-analysis indicate that the vaginal route of misoprostol is the most effective method for managing first-trimester missed abortions. This route achieves a significantly higher success rate and shorter induction- to-expulsion interval, along with greater patient satisfaction during follow-up sessions and fewer side effects.

Keywords: Abortion; Early pregnancy loss; First-trimester abortion; Misoprostol; Oral and vaginal route.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources