Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;58(4):e13787.
doi: 10.1111/cpr.13787. Epub 2024 Dec 15.

Conditional Overexpression of Net1 Enhances the Trans-Differentiation of Lgr5+ Progenitors into Hair Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea

Affiliations

Conditional Overexpression of Net1 Enhances the Trans-Differentiation of Lgr5+ Progenitors into Hair Cells in the Neonatal Mouse Cochlea

Yanqin Lin et al. Cell Prolif. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss is mainly caused by damage to hair cells (HC), which cannot be regenerated spontaneously in adult mammals once damaged. Cochlear Lgr5+ progenitors are characterised by HC regeneration capacity in neonatal mice, and we previously screened several new genes that might induce HC regeneration from Lgr5+ progenitors. Net1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, is one of the screened new genes and is particularly active in cancer cells and is involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. Here, to explore in vivo roles of Net1 in HC regeneration, Net1 loxp/loxp mice were constructed and crossed with Lgr5 CreER/+ mice to conditionally overexpress (cOE) Net1 in cochlear Lgr5+ progenitors. We observed a large number of ectopic HCs in Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mouse cochlea, which showed a dose-dependent effect. Moreover, the EdU assay was unable to detect any EdU+/Sox2+ supporting cells, while lineage tracing showed significantly more regenerated tdTomato+ HCs in Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp tdTomato mice, which indicated that Net1 cOE enhanced HC regeneration by inducing the direct trans-differentiation of Lgr5+ progenitors rather than mitotic HC regeneration. Additionally, qPCR results showed that the transcription factors related to HC regeneration, including Atoh1, Gfi1 and Pou4f3, were significantly upregulated and are probably the mechanism behind the HC regeneration induced by Net1. In conclusion, our study provides new evidence for the role of Net1 in enhancing HC regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea.

Keywords: Net1; HC regeneration; Lgr5+ progenitors; proliferation; trans‐differentiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Conditional overexpression of Net1 in Lgr5+ progenitors. (A, B) Net1 mRNA and protein expression from P3 to P30 in the mouse cochlea were detected by real‐time qPCR (A) and Western blotting (B). (C) Schematic of the construction of C57BL/6J‐Hipp11‐loxp‐STOP‐loxp‐Net1 (Net1 loxp/+ ) transgenic mice. The Net1 gene was expressed as a fusion with a 3× HA tag. (D, E) Breeding (E) and genotyping (D) of Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice. (F) P0‐P1 mice were I.P. injected with tamoxifen (0.075 mg/g body weight) and the cochleae were harvested at P7 to determine the efficiency of Net1 overexpression. (G) Schematic of cell types in the cochlea. OHCs, outer hair cells; IHCs, inner hair cells; IBCs, inner border cells; IPhCs, inner phalangeal cells; IPCs, inner pillar cells; OPCs, outer pillar cells; DCs, Deiters' cells; HECs, Hensen's cells; CCs, Claudius cells. (H, I) The Net1 overexpression in Net1 loxp/+ mice, Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice and Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice was verified by real‐time qPCR (H). The 3× HA tag was stained (red) to identify overexpressed Net1 proteins in Lgr5+ progenitors of Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice, and SCs types are marked in the lateral view (I). Myo7a (green) was used to label HCs, and DAPI (blue) was used to label nuclei. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Scale bar, 20 μm.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Ectopic HCs were significantly increased in Net1 homozygous cOE Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice. (A) Tamoxifen was I.P. injected into P0‐P1 Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice to activate Cre recombinase and subsequently overexpress Net1 in Lgr5+ progenitors. (B) Ectopic OHCs (white arrows and white brackets) and IHCs (yellow arrows) were seen in the apical, middle and basal turns of the P7 Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mouse cochlea. Lgr5 CreER/+ and Net1 loxp/loxp mice were used as controls. Myo7a (green) was used as the HC marker. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C–F) Quantification of the ectopic OHCs (C) and IHCs (D) per turn and the total ectopic OHCs (E) and total ectopic IHCs (F) per cochlea. ‘n’ refers to the number of mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Only ectopic IHCs were slightly but significantly increased in Net1 heterozygous cOE Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice. (A) Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice and Net1 loxp/+ mice were I.P. injected with tamoxifen at P0‐P1, and the mice were sacrificed at P7. Net1 loxp/+ mice were used as controls. (B) Ectopic OHCs (white arrows) and IHCs (yellow arrows) were seen in the apical, middle and basal turns of Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice. Myo7a (green) was used as the HC marker. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C, D) Quantification of the ectopic OHCs per turn and the total ectopic OHCs per cochlea (C), and quantification of the ectopic IHCs per turn and the total ectopic IHCs per cochlea of Net1 loxp/+ mice and Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice (D). ‘n’ refers to the number of cochleae. (E–G) Quantification of the ectopic OHCs per turn (E) and the ectopic IHCs per turn (F), and quantification of the total ectopic OHCs and IHCs per cochlea of Net1 loxp/+ mice, Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/+ mice and Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice (G). ‘n’ refers to the number of cochleae. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
EdU assay and lineage tracing of Lgr5+ progenitors. (A) Tamoxifen was injected into Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice to conditionally overexpress Net1 in Lgr5+ progenitors. EdU (50 mg/kg body weight) was injected at P3‐P5 to label proliferating cells. (B) EdU was stained (red) in Net1 loxp/loxp mice, Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice and positive control cochlea. Sox2 (blue) was used as the SC marker. EdU+/Sox2+ SCs are indicated by yellow arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantification of EdU+ SCs per cochlea. ‘n’ represents the number of mice. (D) Tamoxifen was injected into Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp tdTomato and Lgr5 CreER/+ tdTomato mice at P0‐P1 to lineage trace Lgr5+ progenitors at P7. (E, F) Lineage tracing images of tdTomato+ HCs in the cochlea of Lgr5 CreER/+ tdTomato mice (E) and Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp tdTomato mice (F). Myo7a (green) was used as the HC marker. tdTomato+ OHCs are indicated by white arrows, and tdTomato+ IHCs are indicated by blue arrows. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G–K) Quantification of tdTomato+ OHCs (G) and IHCs (H) per turn, total tdTomato+ OHCs (I) and IHCs (J) per cochlea, and total tdTomato+ HCs (K). ‘n’ represents the number of mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Quantification of the expression of related genes and signalling pathways in Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice. (A) Lgr5 CreER/+ Net1 loxp/loxp mice and Net1 loxp/loxp mice were injected with tamoxifen at P0‐P1, and the RNA of the mouse cochlea was extracted at P7. Net1 loxp/loxp mice were used as controls. (B–F) Relative mRNA expression of transcription factors related to HC regeneration (B), cell cycle (C), Wnt signalling (D), Notch signalling (E) and TGFβ signalling pathways (F). Three independent qPCR experiments were performed. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

References

    1. Kelley M. W., “Regulation of Cell Fate in the Sensory Epithelia of the Inner Ear,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, no. 11 (2006): 837–849. - PubMed
    1. Jang M. W., Lim J., Park M. G., Lee J. H., and Lee C. J., “Active Role of Glia‐Like Supporting Cells in the Organ of Corti: Membrane Proteins and Their Roles in Hearing,” Glia 70, no. 10 (2022): 1799–1825. - PubMed
    1. Wan G., Corfas G., and Stone J. S., “Inner Ear Supporting Cells: Rethinking the Silent Majority,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 24, no. 5 (2013): 448–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Revuelta M., Santaolalla F., Arteaga O., Alvarez A., Sánchez‐del‐Rey A., and Hilario E., “Recent Advances in Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration‐A Promising Opportunity for the Treatment of Age‐Related Hearing Loss,” Ageing Research Reviews 36 (2017): 149–155. - PubMed
    1. Jiang M., Karasawa T., and Steyger P. S., “Aminoglycoside‐Induced Cochleotoxicity: A Review,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 11 (2017): 308. - PMC - PubMed

Substances