Comprehensive Review of Bispecific Antibody Constructs In Multiple Myeloma: Affinities, Dosing Strategies and Future Perspectives
- PMID: 39676006
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.11.012
Comprehensive Review of Bispecific Antibody Constructs In Multiple Myeloma: Affinities, Dosing Strategies and Future Perspectives
Abstract
Despite significant advancements, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable, and there is still a pressing need for new therapeutic strategies with highly selective mechanisms of action and balanced off-target toxicity. In recent years, the development of "off-the-shelf" bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) has significantly enhanced our ability to treat relapsed or refractory MM. Teclistamab, elranatamab (both BCMA × CD3), and talquetamab (GPRC5D × CD3) are approved for treating MM patients who have received at least 3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Meanwhile, the range of available bsAbs is rapidly expanding, offering patients and healthcare providers a broad selection of options that vary in target antigens, binding domains, construct designs, dosing regimens, and side effects. As linvoseltamab, alnuctamab, and ABBV-383 (all BCMA × CD3), as well as forimtamig (GPRC5D × CD3) and cevostamab (FcRH5 × CD3) progress through late-stage clinical development, emerging trispecific antibodies are now available that target either 2 different MM-associated antigens or provide additional co-stimulatory signals to prevent T-cell exhaustion. Despite this plethora of therapeutic options, resistance to bsAbs is an inevitability, and the optimal positioning of these drugs within the current MM treatment landscape remains to be determined. In this review, we examine the available data on all clinically accessible bsAbs, evaluating their potential, current limitations, and implications for efficacy and safety, with the aim of achieving deeper responses and longer overall survival for MM patients.
Keywords: Bispecific antibodies; Construct design; Different formats; Resistance mechanisms; Side effects.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure JMW has consulted for Johnson&Johnson, Sanofi, Takeda, Pfizer, Oncopeptides and Skyline Dx; received honoraria from Takeda, GSK, Pharmamar and Beigene; received research support from BMS. LR has consulted for Johnson&Johnson, Amgen, GSK, Pfizer, BMS and Sanofi; has received honoraria from Johnson&Johnson, GSK, Pfizer, BMS and Sanofi; and has received research funding from Skyline Dx and BMS. KMK received honoraria from Abbvie, BMS, GSK, Johnson&Johnson, Pfizer and Takeda. HE has consulted for BMS, Johnson&Johnson, Amgen, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK and Novartis; discloses research funding from BMS, Johnson&Johnson, Amgen, GSK and Sanofi; has received honoraria from BMS, Johnson&Johnson, Amgen, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK and Novartis; and travel support from BMS, Johnson&Johnson, Amgen, Takeda, Novartis and Sanofi.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
