Selection of third-party logistics in supply chain finance under probabilistic complex hesitant fuzzy sets and distance measures
- PMID: 39676835
- PMCID: PMC11639330
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36544
Selection of third-party logistics in supply chain finance under probabilistic complex hesitant fuzzy sets and distance measures
Abstract
Financial institutions attach great importance to the multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problems of selecting an effective third-party logistics (3PL) service provider in supply chain finance. A suitable 3PL service provider can not only assist financial institutions in carrying out supply chain finance activity but can also replace financial institutions in supervising the operation of a target financing supply chain, therefore minimizing financial institutions' operating risks. However, there is no sufficient study on the selection of a 3PL service provider. Hence, the objective of this paper is to establish an innovative concept of the "probabilistic complex hesitant fuzzy set" (PCHFS), which is a hybrid structure of the complex hesitant fuzzy set and the probabilistic fuzzy set to manage complex information in real-decision theory. This paper examines the periodicity of probabilistic fuzzy information and extends the range from [ ] to the unit disc in the complex plane to provide more ability to describe the full meaning of the information in a mathematical model. Based on the internal structure of the set and to find the degree of discrimination between the pairs of PCHFSs, the generalized distance measures and modified generalized distance measures are defined. Several properties and their relationships between them are derived in detail. Also, several cases of the proposed measures are exposed, which reduces them to the existing studies. Furthermore, based on these proposed measures, a multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) approach is established in an uncertain environment, and several numerical examples are given to examine the feasibility and validity of the explored measures. Finally, the modified and parameterized distance measures based on PCHFSs are verified by comparing them with some existing measures.
Keywords: Decision making; Distance measures; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set; Third party logistic.
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Some complex probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-attribute decision making.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84582-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39910138 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of the Scale of Third-Party Logistics Guaranteeing Firms on Bank Credit Willingness in Supply Chain Finance: An ERP Study.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 12;13:853888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853888. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35496193 Free PMC article.
-
Entropy Based Pythagorean Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Technique and Its Application for Fog-Haze Factor Assessment Problem.Entropy (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;22(3):318. doi: 10.3390/e22030318. Entropy (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33286092 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-attribute decision-making method based on q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy schweizer-sklar power weighted hamy mean operator.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0266779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266779. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36791142 Free PMC article.
-
Interactive group decision making method based on probabilistic hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information representation.Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(15):18226-18247. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03749-0. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022. PMID: 35855435 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wen Z., Liao H., Zavadskas E.K., Al-Barakati A. Selection third-party logistics service providers in supply chain finance by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method. Econ. Res. - Ekon. Istraž. 2019;32(1):4033–4058. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1678502. - DOI
-
- Gürcan Ö.F., Yazıcı İ., Beyca Ö.F., Arslan Ç.Y., Eldemir F. Third party logistics (3PL) provider selection with AHP application. Proc., Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016;235:226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.018. - DOI
-
- Bansal A., Kumar P. 3PL selection using hybrid model of AHP-PROMETHEE. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2013;14(3):373–397. doi: 10.1504/IJSOM.2013.052096. - DOI
-
- Yayla A.Y., Oztekin A., Gumus A.T., Gunasekaran A. A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015;53(20):6097–6113. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1022266. - DOI
-
- Ecer F. Third-party logistics (3PLs) provider selection via fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2018;24(2):615–634. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2016.1213207. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources