Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 17;8(6):756-760.
doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrae044. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Anisogamy and the Darwin-Bateman paradigm

Affiliations

Anisogamy and the Darwin-Bateman paradigm

Tim Janicke. Evol Lett. .

Abstract

The Darwin-Bateman paradigm advanced as the central concept to explain the evolutionary origin of sex differences. However, debates regarding its theoretical underpinnings persist, particularly with respect to the role of anisogamy in sexual selection. The theoretical work presented by Lehtonen and Parker suggests that the initial split in gamete production rate drives sex differences in sexual selection but that any further variation in the degree of anisogamy is not expected to alter the strength of sexual selection in males and females. Here, I discuss the historical background of a recently emerged controversy and present empirical data that corroborate the theoretical predictions. Lehtonen and Parker's contribution refines our understanding of the Darwin-Bateman paradigm by providing a broad theory for large-scale patterns of sex differences that can be observed in nature. Further understanding of how demographic and environmental factors influence sexual selection is essential to predict the vast diversity of sex differences across the tree of life, beyond the primordial impact of anisogamy.

Keywords: Bateman gradient; Bateman’s principle; gamete size; sexual selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Degree of anisogamy and Bateman gradients across animals. Scatter plots show how Bateman gradients of males (blue) and females (red) relate to estimates of anisogamy in terms of gamete size bias (A) and gametic investment bias (B). Higher values indicate increased size of or investment in male gametes and are therefore representative of more isogamous species. Batmen gradients are shown as Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) of the relationship between reproductive success and mating success. The radius of circles corresponds to the precision of the shown estimates of Bateman gradients (i.e., the inverse of the sampling variance in r). Phylogenetically informed meta-analyses suggest that estimates of gamete size ratio and gametic investment ratio are not related to male and female Bateman gradients, i.e., all shown slopes (dashed lines) are not significantly different from zero.

Comment in

  • Anisogamy and sex roles: a commentary.
    Mokos J, Scheuring I, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T. Mokos J, et al. Evol Lett. 2024 Oct 23;8(6):761-763. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrae058. eCollection 2024 Dec. Evol Lett. 2024. PMID: 39677570 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Andersson, L., Jalovaara, M., Saarela, J., & Uggla, C. (2023). A matter of time: Bateman’s principles and mating success as count and duration across social strata in contemporary Finland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 290(2002), 20231061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1061 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(Pt. 3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1948.21 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjork, A., & Pitnick, S. (2006). Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature, 441(7094), 742–745. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04683 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devost, E., & Turgeon, J. (2016). The combined effects of pre- and post-copulatory processes are masking sexual conflict over mating rate in Gerris buenoi. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12772 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dewsbury, D. A. (2005). The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45(5), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/45.5.831 - DOI - PubMed