Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 28:15:1397523.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397523. eCollection 2024.

Silence after narratives by patients in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a conversation analytic study

Affiliations

Silence after narratives by patients in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a conversation analytic study

Carolina Fenner. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In psychotherapy, verbal communication is central to the therapeutic process. However, when patients remain silent, it can serve various functions, such as reflecting more deeply or hesitating to elaborate on a topic. This article uses conversation analysis to examine a specific context in which silence occurs: After a patient has concluded his/her narrative, both the therapist and the patient resist the turn allocation by the respective other, resulting in mutual silence. The results indicate that both therapists and patients collaboratively generate this silence. Therapists typically end the silence with an intervention, addressing an aspect of the topic and treating the pause as intra-topic silence. The study is based on approximately 29 h of video recordings of German-speaking outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy sessions. This research highlights the importance of therapists recognizing the different forms of silence that may emerge during psychotherapy.

Keywords: conversation analysis; narrative; psychodynamic psychotherapy; resistance; silence; therapeutic intervention; turn-taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequential focus of study.

References

    1. Abrahams D., Rohleder P. (2021). A clinical guide to psychodynamic psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
    1. Amar C., Nanbu Z., Greer T. (2022). Proffering absurd candidate formulations in the pursuit of progressivity. Classroom Discourse 13, 264–292. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2020.1798259 - DOI
    1. Bercelli F., Rossano F., Viaro M. (2008). Different place, different action: clients’ personal narratives in psychotherapy. Text & Talk 28, 283–305. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.014 - DOI
    1. Berger I. (2011). Support and evidence for considering local contingencies in studying and transcribing silence in conversation. Pragmatics 21, 291–306. doi: 10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber - DOI
    1. Bergmann J. R. (1982). “Schweigephasen im Gespräch: Aspekte ihrer interaktiven Organisation” in Beiträge zu einer empirischen Sprachsoziologie. ed. Soeffner H.-G. (Tübingen: Narr; ), 143–184.

LinkOut - more resources