Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 16:10.1037/abn0000966.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000966. Online ahead of print.

Where does attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder fit in the psychopathology hierarchy? A symptom-focused analysis

Affiliations

Where does attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder fit in the psychopathology hierarchy? A symptom-focused analysis

Zheyue Peng et al. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. .

Abstract

Modern psychopathology classification systems position attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with different groups of conditions, either with externalizing or neurodevelopmental. As such, the optimal placement of ADHD in modern classification systems remains unclear. We advanced the literature by mapping ADHD symptoms onto three transdiagnostic psychopathology spectra-externalizing, neurodevelopmental, and internalizing-and their symptoms. ADHD symptoms had varied associations with different spectra, with subsets of symptoms relating most strongly to externalizing, others to neurodevelopmental, and still others to internalizing. Impulsivity, poor schoolwork, and low perseverance were most closely tied to externalizing, cognitive disengagement symptoms (e.g., confused, stared blankly, daydreamed) and immaturity were most closely tied to neurodevelopment, and cognitive disengagement symptoms were also tied to internalizing. Our findings advise against conceptualizing and treating ADHD as a unitary construct and against placing ADHD exclusively under either externalizing or neurodevelopmental spectra. Symptom-focused approaches will better inform modern psychopathology classification systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

There is no conflict of interest in authorship or the publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (Ed.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed). American Psychiatric Association. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 - DOI
    1. Andrews G, Pine DS, Hobbs MJ, Anderson TM, & Sunderland M. (2009). Neurodevelopmental disorders: Cluster 2 of the proposed meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11: Paper 3 of 7 of the thematic section: ‘A proposal for a meta-structure for DSM-V and ICD-11.’ Psychological Medicine, 39(12), 2013–2023. 10.1017/S0033291709990274 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azeredo A, Moreira D, & Barbosa F. (2018). ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 82, 10–19. 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barkley RA (2014). Sluggish cognitive tempo (concentration deficit disorder?): Current status, future directions, and a plea to change the name. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(1), 117–125. 10.1007/s10802-013-9824-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauermeister JJ, Alegría M, Bird HR, Rubio-stipec M, & Canino G. (1992). Are attentional-hyperactivity deficits unidimensional or multidimensional syndromes? Empirical findings from a community survey. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(3), 423–431. 10.1097/00004583-199205000-00007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources