Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb;32(1):97-111.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02300-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.

Diagnostic performance of neural network algorithms in skull fracture detection on CT scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic performance of neural network algorithms in skull fracture detection on CT scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guive Sharifi et al. Emerg Radiol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background and aim: The potential intricacy of skull fractures as well as the complexity of underlying anatomy poses diagnostic hurdles for radiologists evaluating computed tomography (CT) scans. The necessity for automated diagnostic tools has been brought to light by the shortage of radiologists and the growing demand for rapid and accurate fracture diagnosis. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a potential new class of medical imaging technologies that use deep learning (DL) to improve diagnosis accuracy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess how well CNN models diagnose skull fractures on CT images.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published before February 2024 that used CNN models to detect skull fractures on CT scans. Meta-analyses were conducted for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Egger's and Begg's tests were used to assess publication bias.

Results: Meta-analysis was performed for 11 studies with 20,798 patients. Pooled average AUC for implementing pre-training for transfer learning in CNN models within their training model's architecture was 0.96 ± 0.02. The pooled averages of the studies' sensitivity and specificity were 1.0 and 0.93, respectively. The accuracy was obtained 0.92 ± 0.04. Studies showed heterogeneity, which was explained by differences in model topologies, training models, and validation techniques. There was no significant publication bias detected.

Conclusion: CNN models perform well in identifying skull fractures on CT scans. Although there is considerable heterogeneity and possibly publication bias, the results suggest that CNNs have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in the imaging of acute skull trauma. To further enhance these models' practical applicability, future studies could concentrate on the utility of DL models in prospective clinical trials.

Keywords: Convolutional Neural Networks; Deep Learning; Fracture; Skull.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent to participate: Not Applicable. Consent for publication: Not Applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gakuu LN (2011) The challenge of fracture management in osteoporotic bones. East Afr Orthop J 4
    1. Scheyerer MJ, Simmen H-P, Wanner GA, Werner CML (2012) Osteoporotic fractures of axial skeleton. Praxis 101(16):1021–1030
    1. Jacob O, Prathap A (2021) Maxillary Fractures. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician
    1. Furlow B 2014 Computed tomography of facial fractures. Radiologic technology. 85 5:523CT-39CT; quiz 40CT-42CT
    1. Kendler DL, Bauer DC, Davison KS, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST et al (2016) Vertebral Fractures: Clinical Importance and Management. Am J Med 129(2):221.e1–10