The emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by a sperm bank
- PMID: 39680360
- PMCID: PMC11871279
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03357-6
The emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by a sperm bank
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by the sperm bank.
Methods: An online questionnaire was administered at Cryos International in the USA and Denmark to sperm donor candidates who had received notification that they were ineligible to donate.
Results: A total of 101 rejected donor candidates completed the questionnaire. The majority were disappointed and surprised by the rejection but only a relatively small group had concerns about their health, fertility or manhood. More than half of them (54.5%) were satisfied with the way they were informed of their ineligibility while 17.8% were neutral, and 27.7% were dissatisfied. Approximately half (47.5%) thought that the information provided to them was sufficient while 24.8% were neutral and one in four (27.8%) considered it as insufficient. The most frequent suggestions for improvement were to provide an information leaflet specific to the reason of rejection, offer personal counselling and explain better what the implications are for them.
Conclusion: There is room for improvement in the information provided to donor candidates about the reason for their rejection. Although some information is already currently provided, a minority of donor candidates considered this to be insufficient. However, rejected candidates do not request more information on their own initiative. Routine provision of an information sheet specific to each reason for rejection may improve the experience of these men.
Keywords: Candidate sperm donor; Donor screening; Gamete donation; Information provision; Rejection; Sperm bank.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: EL, JGL, LT and ABS are employed by Cryos International. GP and AP are members of the External Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) of Cryos.
Similar articles
-
Recent decline in sperm motility among donor candidates at a sperm bank in Denmark.Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1618-1627. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae115. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38834185 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank.Hum Reprod. 2019 Nov 1;34(11):2208-2218. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez173. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31711146 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of the outcome of 11 712 men applying to be sperm donors in Denmark and the USA.Hum Reprod. 2023 Mar 1;38(3):352-358. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac264. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 36617425 Free PMC article.
-
The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1702-1710. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab067. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33842976 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical and legal issues in the use of related donors for therapeutic insemination.Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Nov;29(4):855-61. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00089-7. Urol Clin North Am. 2002. PMID: 12516757 Review.
References
-
- Lassen E, Kesmodel US, Bay B, Skytte A-B. Four decades of sperm donation: motivation and attitudes among donors. Fertil Steril. 2024;121:349–52. - PubMed
-
- Paul S, Harbottle S, Stewart JA. Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-upon-Tyne experience 1994–2003. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:150–8. - PubMed
-
- Liu J, Dai Y, Li Y, Yuan E, Wang Q, Guan Y, Lou H. Analysis of the screening results of 24040 potential sperm donors in a human sperm bank in Henan province, China: a 14-year retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:1205–12. - PubMed
-
- Garrido N, Zuzuarregui JL, Meseguer M, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Sperm and oocyte donor selection and management: experience of a 10 year follow-up of more than 2100 candidates. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3142–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical