Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;42(2):451-457.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03357-6. Epub 2024 Dec 16.

The emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by a sperm bank

Affiliations

The emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by a sperm bank

Guido Pennings et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by the sperm bank.

Methods: An online questionnaire was administered at Cryos International in the USA and Denmark to sperm donor candidates who had received notification that they were ineligible to donate.

Results: A total of 101 rejected donor candidates completed the questionnaire. The majority were disappointed and surprised by the rejection but only a relatively small group had concerns about their health, fertility or manhood. More than half of them (54.5%) were satisfied with the way they were informed of their ineligibility while 17.8% were neutral, and 27.7% were dissatisfied. Approximately half (47.5%) thought that the information provided to them was sufficient while 24.8% were neutral and one in four (27.8%) considered it as insufficient. The most frequent suggestions for improvement were to provide an information leaflet specific to the reason of rejection, offer personal counselling and explain better what the implications are for them.

Conclusion: There is room for improvement in the information provided to donor candidates about the reason for their rejection. Although some information is already currently provided, a minority of donor candidates considered this to be insufficient. However, rejected candidates do not request more information on their own initiative. Routine provision of an information sheet specific to each reason for rejection may improve the experience of these men.

Keywords: Candidate sperm donor; Donor screening; Gamete donation; Information provision; Rejection; Sperm bank.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: EL, JGL, LT and ABS are employed by Cryos International. GP and AP are members of the External Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) of Cryos.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lassen E, Kesmodel US, Bay B, Skytte A-B. Four decades of sperm donation: motivation and attitudes among donors. Fertil Steril. 2024;121:349–52. - PubMed
    1. Pacey AA, Pennings G, Mocanu E, Rothman Hermann J, Pinborg A, Willum Adrian S, Burke C, Skytte A-B. An analysis of the outcome of 11,712 men applying to be sperm donors in Denmark and the USA. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:352–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul S, Harbottle S, Stewart JA. Recruitment of sperm donors: the Newcastle-upon-Tyne experience 1994–2003. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:150–8. - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Dai Y, Li Y, Yuan E, Wang Q, Guan Y, Lou H. Analysis of the screening results of 24040 potential sperm donors in a human sperm bank in Henan province, China: a 14-year retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:1205–12. - PubMed
    1. Garrido N, Zuzuarregui JL, Meseguer M, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Sperm and oocyte donor selection and management: experience of a 10 year follow-up of more than 2100 candidates. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3142–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources