Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 6;2(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00061-6.

Evaluation of population-based screening programs on colorectal cancer screening uptake and predictors in Atlantic Canada: insights from a repeated cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Evaluation of population-based screening programs on colorectal cancer screening uptake and predictors in Atlantic Canada: insights from a repeated cross-sectional study

Kazeem Adefemi et al. BMC Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant public health challenge in Canada, with the Atlantic provinces bearing a particularly high burden. The implementation of population-based colon screening programs is aimed to address this concern. However, limited research exists on the effect of these programs especially in Canada. This study aimed to examine the impact of the first few years of the CRC screening programs in the Atlantic provinces of Canada by assessing changes in screening uptake, barriers, and predictors of screening among eligible populations.

Methods: Employing a repeated cross-sectional design, this study analyzed data from a representative sample of 7614 respondents in 2010 and 6850 in 2017 from the Atlantic provinces aged 50-74 years, extracted from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS). The outcomes measured were CRC screening rates, changes in predictors of screening uptake, and barriers to participation. Potential predictors examined included age, sex, income, education, smoking, and health status.

Results: The proportion of adults aged 50-74 years who meet CRC screening requirements increased from 42% in 2010 to 54% in 2017 yet below the national target of 60%. New Brunswick reported the most significant increase in screening prevalence (18%, p < 0.05). Participation in fecal tests increased from 19.6 to 32.4%. Despite these improvements, disparities in screening participation remained, with lower uptake observed among individuals with lower income and education levels. Age (> 60 years, OR = 2.09, p < 0.01), the presence of multiple chronic health conditions (OR = 2.11, p < 0. 01), being female (OR = 1.21, p < 0.01), married status (OR = 1.21, p < 0.05), access to regular healthcare (OR = 1.91, p < 0.01), and nonsmoking status (OR = 2.55, p < 0.01) were identified as significant predictors of CRC screening uptake.

Conclusions: This study shows that while CRC screening uptake increased across the Atlantic provinces between 2010 and 2017, barriers to and disparities in screening participation persist. This highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve awareness, access, and screening uptake, particularly among disadvantaged groups, to promote equitable healthcare outcomes. Continued efforts should focus on reducing barriers to screening and leveraging available evidence to inform interventions aimed at mitigating the CRC burden in the region.

Keywords: Atlantic Canada; Cancer prevention; Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Health determinants; Healthcare disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The exclusive use of secondary data from Statistics Canada exempted this study from review by the Health Research Ethics Board (HREB) of Memorial University of Newfoundland. Based on guidance in the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans — TCPS 2 (a joint policy of Canada’s three federal research agencies — the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) or “the Agencies”): Research that relies exclusively on information that is made available through legislation or regulation does not require REB review (Article 2.2). Exemption from REB review for research involving this type of information is based on the presence of a custodian/steward designated in accordance with access to information and privacy legislation who protects privacy and proprietary interests associated with the information (e.g., an access to information and privacy coordinator or a guardian of Canadian census data). Tri-Council Policy Statement is available at https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html . Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tung J, Politis CE, Chadder J, Han J, Niu J, Fung S, et al. The north-south and east-west gradient in colorectal cancer risk: a look at the distribution of modifiable risk factors and incidence across Canada. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(3):231–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Canadian Partnership Against. Colorectal Screening in Canada: 2019/2020 Environmental Scan. Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2021.
    1. Decker KM, Lambert P, Bravo J, Demers A, Singh H. Time trends in colorectal cancer incidence from 1992 to 2016 and colorectal cancer mortality from 1980 to 2018 by age group and geography in Canada. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(2):338–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner DR, Poirier A, Woods RR, Ellison LF, Jean-Michel B, Alain AD, et al. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022. Can Med Assoc J. 2022;194(17):E601. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Society. Canadian Cancer Statistics: a 2022 special report on cancer prevalence. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee; 2022.

LinkOut - more resources