Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 7;16(23):4106.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16234106.

Bayesan Model to Predict R Status After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Bayesan Model to Predict R Status After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Isabella Frigerio et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Objective: To build a Bayesian approach-based model to predict the success of surgical exploration post-neoadjuvant treatment.

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is best treated with radical surgery and chemotherapy, offering the greatest chance of survival. Surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is indicated in the absence of progression, knowing the limits in accurately predicting resectability with traditional radiology. R Status being a pathological parameter, it can be assessed only after surgery.

Method: Patients successfully resected for histologically confirmed PDAC after NAT for BR and LA disease were included, with attention to the predictors of R status from the existing literature. The Bayesian logistic regression model was estimated for predicting the R1 status. The area under curve (AUC) of the average posterior probability of R1 was calculated and results were reported considering the 95% posterior credible intervals for the odds ratios, along with the probability of direction.

Results: The final model demonstrated a commendable AUC value of 0.72, indicating good performance. The likelihood of positive margins was associated with older age, higher ASA score, the presence of venous and/or arterial involvement at preoperative radiology, tumor location within the pancreatic body, a lack of tumor size reduction post-NAT, and the persistence of an elevated Ca19.9 value.

Conclusions: A Bayesian approach using only preoperative items is firstly used with good performance to predict R Status in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent resection after neoadjuvant therapy.

Keywords: Bayesan model; R Status; neoadjuvant therapy; pancreatic cancer; predictive model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival by R status.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023;73:17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oba A., Ho F., Bao Q.R., Al-Musawi M.H., Schulick R.D., Del Chiaro M. Neoadjuvant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:245. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jung H.S., Kim H.S., Kang J.S., Kang Y.H., Sohn H.J., Byun Y., Han Y., Yun W.G., Cho Y.J., Lee M., et al. Oncologic Benefits of Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Upfront Surgery in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 2022;14:4360. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184360. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conroy T., Hammel P., Hebbar M., Ben Abdelghani M., Wei A.C., Raoul J.-L., Choné L., Francois E., Artru P., Biagi J.J., et al. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2395–2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Guidelines Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Version 2. 2023. [(accessed on 12 June 2024)]. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources