Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 7;14(23):3535.
doi: 10.3390/ani14233535.

Enteric Methane Emission from Cattle Grazing Systems with Cover Crops and Legume-Grass Pasture

Affiliations

Enteric Methane Emission from Cattle Grazing Systems with Cover Crops and Legume-Grass Pasture

José Ignacio Gere et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

This study aims to quantify enteric methane (CH4) emission and dry matter intake (DMI) in beef steers under two rotational grazing systems: (i) a mixture of cover crops (vetch + ryegrass + forage radish) (CC) and (ii) alfalfa and fescue pasture (AFP). Eighteen Hereford steers were divided into two groups (nine steers per group), assigned to either the CC or AFP. Methane emissions were measured using the SF6 tracer technique. The results showed that steers grazing CC produced 29% less CH4 in g/d compared to those on the AFP (119.1 vs. 167.1 g/d for CC and AFP, p < 0.05) and 36% less CH4 yield (4.3 vs. 6.7% of gross energy intake). However, average daily gain (ADG), DMI, and CH4 intensity (gCH4/kg ADG) did not significantly differ between treatments. The integration of CC in a cattle grazing system has the potential to reduce CH4 emissions by improving forage quality.

Keywords: SF6 tracer technique; agriculture; beef cattle; grazing systems; livestock production; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Images of the two systems evaluated: a cover crop mixture with annual ryegrass, hairy vetch, and a forage radish (CC) (left); and an alfalfa-fescue pasture (AFP) (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Animals in the experiment with equipment set up for monitoring enteric methane emissions using the SF6 tracer technique. Two sample collection systems are placed for each animal inside the blue corrugated tube, which serves to contain the equipment, and the tube is secured to the muzzle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between methane emission intensity (gCH4/kg ADG) and averaged daily gain (ADG) for Hereford steers from CC (white squares) and from AFP (black circles) treatments.

References

    1. Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., Connors S.L., Péan C., Berger S., Caud N., Chen Y., Goldfarb L., Gomis M.I., et al. IPCC Climate Change. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2021.
    1. Morgavi D.P., Cantalapiedra-Hijar G., Eugène M., Martin C., Noziere P., Popova M., Ortigues-Marty I., Muñoz-Tamayo R., Ungerfeld E.M. Reducing enteric methane emissions improves energy metabolism in livestock: Is the tenet right? Animal. 2023;17:100830. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100830. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Islam M., Lee S.S. Advanced estimation and mitigation strategies: A cumulative approach to enteric methane abatement from ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2019;61:122. doi: 10.5187/jast.2019.61.3.122. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson K.A., Johnson D.E. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;73:2483–2492. doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. INDEC . Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2018: Resultados Definitivos. 1st ed. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos—INDEC; Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina: 2021.

LinkOut - more resources