Comparison of Modified Labor Induction Strategies for Pregnant Women at a Single Tertiary Center Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- PMID: 39682647
- PMCID: PMC11640242
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14232739
Comparison of Modified Labor Induction Strategies for Pregnant Women at a Single Tertiary Center Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially impacted healthcare systems and obstetric practices worldwide. Labor induction is a common procedure for preventing obstetric complications in high-risk populations. This study evaluated perinatal outcomes of labor induction using a modified management protocol in a tertiary care center during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study by reviewing electronic structured delivery records of women who underwent elective labor induction between June 2020 and October 2022. We analyzed maternal characteristics, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes during the pre-pandemic (June 2020 to May 2021) and pandemic periods (May 2021 to October 2022).
Results: The study included 976 cases: 325 pregnancies in the pre-pandemic group and 651 in the pandemic group. The pandemic group showed earlier gestational age at delivery (39 vs. 40 weeks, p < 0.01) and lower body mass index (27.1 vs. 27.5 kg/m2, p = 0.03). During the pandemic period, we observed a significant increase in labor induction cases and a decrease in cesarean sections. Neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores and intensive care admissions, showed no significant differences between groups. Subgroup analysis identified advanced maternal age (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.03-1.14; p < 0.01) and primiparity (OR = 5.24; 95% CI = 2.75-9.99; p < 0.01) as independent risk factors for cesarean delivery.
Conclusions: Even under modified protocols for labor induction during the COVID-19 pandemic, more pregnancies underwent labor induction while achieving a significant reduction in cesarean sections. Advanced maternal age and primiparity were identified as independent risk factors associated with cesarean delivery.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; cesarean section; fetal outcomes; labor induction; maternal outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32889327
-
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30716284
-
Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Mar;67(2):170-177. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13313. Epub 2022 Feb 2. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35107213
-
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29291413
-
Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37171818 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It. [(accessed on 31 July 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica....
-
- Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. [(accessed on 1 August 2024)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov.tw/en.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources