Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 6;25(23):13116.
doi: 10.3390/ijms252313116.

Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Metabolism of Medicago sativa Under Continuous Light from Red-Blue-Green LEDs Responded Better to High Nitrogen Concentrations than Under Red-Blue LEDs

Affiliations

Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Metabolism of Medicago sativa Under Continuous Light from Red-Blue-Green LEDs Responded Better to High Nitrogen Concentrations than Under Red-Blue LEDs

Ren Chen et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Alfalfa is a widely grown forage with a high crude protein content. Clarifying the interactions between light quality and nitrogen level on yield and nitrogen metabolism can purposely improve alfalfa productivity in plant factories with artificial light (PFAL). In this study, the growth, quality, and nitrogen metabolism of alfalfa grown in PFAL were investigated using three nitrate-nitrogen concentrations (10, 15, and 20 mM, labeled as N10, N15, and N20) and continuous light (CL) with two light qualities (red-blue and red-blue-green light, labeled as RB-C and RBG-C). The results showed that the adaptation performance of alfalfa to nitrogen concentrations differed under red-blue and red-blue-green CL. Plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, yield, Chl a + b, Chl a, Chl b, crude protein contents, and NiR activity under the RB-CN15 treatment were significantly higher than RB-CN10 and RB-CN20 treatments. The RB-CN20 treatment showed morphological damage, such as plant dwarfing and leaf chlorosis, and physiological damage, including the accumulation of proline, H2O2, and MDA. However, the difference was that under red-blue-green CL, the leaf area, yield, and Chl a + b, carotenoid, nitrate, and glutamate contents under RBG-CN20 treatment were significantly higher than in the RBG-CN10 and RBG-CN15 treatments. Meanwhile, the contents of soluble sugar, starch, and cysteine were significantly lower. However, the crude protein content reached 21.15 mg·g-1. The fresh yield, dry yield, stomatal conductance, leaf area, plant height, stem diameter, crude protein, GS, and free amino acids of alfalfa were positively correlated with increased green light. In addition, with the increase in nitrogen concentration, photosynthetic capacity, NiR, and GOGAT activities increased, promoting growth and improving feeding value. The growth, yield, photosynthetic pigments, carbon, nitrogen substances, and enzyme activities of alfalfa were significantly affected by the interaction between nitrogen concentration and light quality, whereas leaf/stem ratio and DPPH had no effect. In conclusion, RB-CN15 and RBG-CN20 are suitable for the production of alfalfa in PFAL, and green light can increase the threshold for the nitrogen concentration adaptation of alfalfa.

Keywords: alfalfa; crude protein; enzyme activity; plant factory with artificial light (PFAL); yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Appearance of alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Growth characteristics and yield of alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations with red–blue and red–blue–green CL. (A) Plant height, (B) stem diameter, (C) leaf area, (D) fresh yield, (E) dry yield, (F) fresh/dry ratio, (G) leaf/stem ratio, and (H) specific leaf area. Data are means ± SE; n = 5. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance, and Fv/Fm of alfalfa leaves under red and blue light and green light instead of red light. (A) Chl a + b content, (B) Chl a content, (C) Chl b content, (D) carotenoid content, (E) stomatal conductance, and (F) Fv/Fm. Data are means ± SE; n = 5. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Soluble sugar (A), sucrose (B), starch (C), soluble protein (D), free amino acid (E), and crude protein (F) contents in alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
DPPH free radical clearance rate (A), Proline (B), H2O2 (C), and MDA (D) contents in alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Nitrate (A) and ammonium (B) contents and activities of NR (C) and NiR (D) in alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Glutamate (A), cysteine (B), and lysine (C) contents and activities of GOGAT (D), GS (E), GDH (F), CS (G), and AK (H) in alfalfa under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Error bars with different letters show a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Correlation and heatmap analysis of growth characteristics, yield, photosynthetic pigment content, stomatal conductance, and Fv/Fm under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Note. * Significant at the p < 0.05 level of probability, ** significant at the p < 0.01 level of probability, *** significant at the p < 0.001 level of probability.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Correlation and heatmap analysis of carbon and nitrogen substances and enzyme activities under three nitrogen concentrations and CL with two light qualities. Note. * Significant at the p < 0.05 level of probability, ** significant at the p < 0.01 level of probability, *** significant at the p < 0.001 level of probability.

References

    1. Feng H.L., Guo J.H., Peng C.H., Kneeshaw D., Roberge G., Pan C., Ma X.H., Zhou D., Wang W.F. Nitrogen addition promotes terrestrial plants to allocate more biomass to aboveground organs: A global meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2023;29:3970–3989. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16731. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hadidi M., Orellana Palacios J.C., Mcclements D.J., Mahfouzi M., Moreno A. Alfalfa as a sustainable source of plant-based food proteins. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023;135:202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.023. - DOI
    1. Wang T.Z., Zhang W.H. Priorities for the development of alfalfa pasture in Northern China. Fundam. Res. 2023;3:225–228. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.04.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamran M., Yan Z.G., Chang S.H., Chen X.J., Ahmad I., Jia Q.M., Ghani M.U., Nouman M., Hou F.J. Enhancing resource use efficiency of alfalfa with appropriate irrigation and fertilization strategy mitigate greenhouse gases emissions in the arid region of Northwest China. Field Crops Res. 2022;289:108715. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108715. - DOI
    1. Kamran M., Yan Z.G., Jia Q.M., Chang S.H., Ahmad I., Ghani M.U., Hou F.J. Irrigation and nitrogen fertilization influence on alfalfa yield, nutritive value, and resource use efficiency in an arid environment. Field Crops Res. 2022;284:108587. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108587. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources