Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 30;13(23):7295.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13237295.

Counselling in Fetal Medicine: Complications of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies

Affiliations
Review

Counselling in Fetal Medicine: Complications of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies

Sara Sorrenti et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Twin pregnancies are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared to singletons. Among all twins, monochorionic pregnancies are at higher risk of specific and non-specific complications compared to dichorionic pregnancies. Therefore, it is of great importance to properly counsel future parents with monochorionic pregnancies regarding the risks of adverse outcomes and the modalities of monitoring and intervention of the potential complications. Conditions related to the monochorionicity include twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP), and twin anemia polycythemia syndrome (TAPS); other complications include selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) and congenital anomalies. This review aims to summarize the information available in the current literature regarding the complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies, including outcomes and guideline recommendations about the clinical surveillance, management, and timing of interventions of these conditions that should be included in counselling in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: MCDA; complicated pregnancy; diamniotic; monochorionic; twin pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lewi L. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2022;4:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Umur A., van Gemert M.J., Nikkels P.G. Monoamniotic-versus diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas: Anastomoses and twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;189:1325–1329. doi: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00811-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moldenhauer J.S., Johnson M.P. Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Monochorionic Twins. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;58:632–642. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Degenhardt J., Enzensberger C., Tenzer A., Kawecki A., Kohl T., Axt-Fliedner R. Management of Complicated Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies. Z. Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2015;219:22–27. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1382002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalil A., Rodgers M., Baschat A., Bhide A., Gratacos E., Hecher K., Oepkes D., Raine-Fenning N., Reed K., Salomon L.J., et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;47:247–263. doi: 10.1002/uog.15821. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources