Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 4;13(23):7392.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13237392.

Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Techniques in Acute Coronary Syndrome from the Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry

Affiliations

Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Techniques in Acute Coronary Syndrome from the Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry

Mateusz Barycki et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The double-kissing (DK) culotte technique is a modification of the culotte technique that employs initial kissing balloon inflation after first stent implantation. The DK culotte technique may improve strut apposition and procedural outcomes; however, data on its efficacy and safety remain limited. This study aimed to investigate the short-term outcomes of bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the DK culotte technique compared with those of the culotte technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: This two-center, observational, retrospective study included patients with ACS. Out of 12,132 screened patients, 117 and 122 underwent DK culotte and culotte PCIs, respectively, with 117 and 57 patients remaining after propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), which included cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) comprising myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and TLR; contrast medium amount (mL); and cumulative radiation dose (mGy). Results: At 1 year, TLF occurred in 7% and 12% of the DK culotte and culotte groups, respectively (p = 0.17). No significant differences were observed in MACEs between the groups (13% DK culotte vs. 19% culotte; p = 0.12). Additionally, the DK culotte technique did not cause higher contrast medium usage or cumulative radiation dosage. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found in TLF and MACE reduction between ACS patients treated with the DK culotte technique and the culotte technique. The observed trend favoring the DK culotte needs further validation in prospective studies.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; bifurcation lesions; culotte technique; endovascular procedures; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Central illustration. Comparative short-term outcomes of DK culotte and culotte techniques in acute coronary syndrome bifurcations: a two-center retrospective study (LSCBR registry). ACS—acute coronary syndrome; DK culotte—double-kissing culotte; LSCBR—The Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry; MACE—major adverse cardiac event; PCI—percutaneous coronary intervention; TLF—target lesion failure; TLR—target lesion revascularization. (a) One-year Kaplan–Meier curves, demonstrating the TLF survival rates; (b) one-year Kaplan–Meier curves, demonstrating the MACE survival rates; (c) one-year Kaplan–Meier curves, demonstrating the all-cause death survival rates; (d) one-year Kaplan–Meier curves, demonstrating the TLR survival rates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a)—Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for target lesion failure after propensity score matching. (b)—Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for major adverse cardiac events after propensity score matching. AF: atrial fibrillation; CI: confidence interval; DM2: diabetes mellitus type 2; HR: hazard ratio; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; LM: left main; OCT: optical coherence tomography.

References

    1. Steigen T.K., Maeng M., Wiseth R., Erglis A., Kumsars I., Narbute I., Gunnes P., Mannsverk J., Meyerdierks O., Rotevatn S., et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation. 2006;114:1955–1961. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.664920. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elwany M., Palma G.D., Cortese B. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Future Cardiol. 2018;14:165–179. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albiero R., Burzotta F., Lassen J.F., Lefèvre T., Banning A.P., Chatzizisis Y.S., Johnson T.W., Ferenc M., Pan M., Daremont O., et al. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part I: Implanting the first stent in the provisional pathway. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2022;18:e362–e376. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rigatelli G., Zuin M., Gianese F., Adami D., Carraro M., Roncon L. Single versus Double Stenting in NSTEMI Patients with Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:3559. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123559. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krittanawong C., Virk H.U.H., Qadeer Y.K., Irshad U., Wang Z., Alam M., Sharma S. Clinical Outcomes Following Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:5916. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185916. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources