Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
- PMID: 39686688
- PMCID: PMC11837875
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.16539
Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters for occurrence of VAs in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation.
Methods and results: All consecutive patients (n = 264) with previous ICD who underwent LVAD surgery between May 2011 and December 2019 at our institution were included. The patients were predominantly male (89%) with NICM (59%) and a mean age of 59 ± 10 years. All LVADs were continuous flow device (154 HVAD, 21 HeartMate II, and 89 HeartMate 3). A total of 102 (39%) patients had VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation. We compared echocardiographic parameters in patients with and without VAs before LVAD, at 1 month and 1 year after LVAD implantation. Increased pre-LVEDD ≥ 72 mm predicted the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation for ICM patients (HR: 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.3-6.6], p = 0.012), while a larger pre-RVEDD ≥ 46 mm was predictive in NICM patients (HR: 2.8, (CI): [1.4-5.9], p = 0.004). Moreover, a larger RVEDD at 1 year after LVAD was highly associated with VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation (50 ± 10 vs. 45 ± 8 mm, p = 0.001). All patients demonstrated a significant decrease in LVEDD as well as a reduction in severity of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation during 1 year after LVAD implantation, reflecting left ventricular unloading through the LVAD.
Conclusions: Larger left and right ventricular diameters before LVAD predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation in ICM and NICM patients. Persistent RV remodeling post-LVAD is also associated with VAs.
Keywords: echocardiographic predictors; left ventricular assist device; ventricular arrhythmias.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead revision following left ventricular assist device implantation.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1509-1518. doi: 10.1111/jce.14487. Epub 2020 Apr 29. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32275340
-
The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):668-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000457. Epub 2013 Jul 19. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23873139
-
Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.Europace. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1689-1694. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw323. Europace. 2017. PMID: 27856539
-
Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1111/jce.14431. Epub 2020 Mar 9. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32128931 Review.
-
Late Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes and Predictors.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):386-393. doi: 10.1111/pace.15158. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39925318 Review.
References
-
- Ponikowski P., Voors A. A., Anker S. D., et al., ESC Scientific Document Group ., “2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed With the Special Contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC,” European Heart Journal 37, no. 27 (July 2016): 2129–2200. - PubMed
-
- Makki N., Mesubi O., Steyers C., Olshansky B., and Abraham W. T., “Meta‐Analysis of the Relation of Ventricular Arrhythmias to All‐Cause Mortality After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device,” American Journal of Cardiology 116 (2015): 1385–1390. - PubMed
-
- Topilsky Y., Oh J. K., Atchison F. W., et al., “Echocardiographic Findings in Stable Outpatients With Properly Functioning Heartmate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24, no. 2 (February 2011): 157–169. - PubMed
-
- Estep J. D., Stainback R. F., Little S. H., Torre G., and Zoghbi W. A., “The Role of Echocardiography and Other Imaging Modalities in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 3, no. 10 (October 2010): 1049–1064. - PubMed
-
- Topilsky Y., Oh J. K., Shah D. K., et al., “Echocardiographic Predictors of Adverse Outcomes After Continuous Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 4, no. 3 (March 2011): 211–222. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical