Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;36(2):387-395.
doi: 10.1111/jce.16539. Epub 2024 Dec 16.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Affiliations

Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Elena Efimova et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters for occurrence of VAs in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation.

Methods and results: All consecutive patients (n = 264) with previous ICD who underwent LVAD surgery between May 2011 and December 2019 at our institution were included. The patients were predominantly male (89%) with NICM (59%) and a mean age of 59 ± 10 years. All LVADs were continuous flow device (154 HVAD, 21 HeartMate II, and 89 HeartMate 3). A total of 102 (39%) patients had VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation. We compared echocardiographic parameters in patients with and without VAs before LVAD, at 1 month and 1 year after LVAD implantation. Increased pre-LVEDD ≥ 72 mm predicted the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation for ICM patients (HR: 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.3-6.6], p = 0.012), while a larger pre-RVEDD ≥ 46 mm was predictive in NICM patients (HR: 2.8, (CI): [1.4-5.9], p = 0.004). Moreover, a larger RVEDD at 1 year after LVAD was highly associated with VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation (50 ± 10 vs. 45 ± 8 mm, p = 0.001). All patients demonstrated a significant decrease in LVEDD as well as a reduction in severity of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation during 1 year after LVAD implantation, reflecting left ventricular unloading through the LVAD.

Conclusions: Larger left and right ventricular diameters before LVAD predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation in ICM and NICM patients. Persistent RV remodeling post-LVAD is also associated with VAs.

Keywords: echocardiographic predictors; left ventricular assist device; ventricular arrhythmias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Etiology of NICM in LVAD patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier plot of the time to the first VA event according to pre‐LVEDD in ICM patients (A), pre‐RVEDD in ICM patients (B), pre‐LVEDD in NICM patients (C), and pre‐RVEDD in NICM patients (D). (A) 8‐month rate for ICM patients with pre‐LVEDD ≥ 72 mm 47% CI [32.5–61.1], for patients with pre‐LVEDD < 72 mm 74% CI [61.6–85.6]. (B) 8‐month rate for ICM patients with pre‐RVEDD ≥ 46 mm 61% CI [45.2–77.0], for patients with pre‐RVEDD < 46 mm 61% CI [47.5–74.1]. (C) 8‐month rate for NICM patients with pre‐LVEDD ≥ 72 mm 68% CI [56.6–78.6], for patients with pre‐LVAD < 72 mm 59% CI [47.5–70.3]. (D) 8‐month rate for NICM patients with pre‐RVEDD ≥ 46 mm 55% CI [43.2–67.2], for patients with pre‐RVEDD < 46 mm 71% CI [60.2–82.2].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier plot of the time to the first VA event according to RV diameter reduction at 1 year after LVAD. 8‐month rate for patients with RV diameter reduction ≥ 2 mm 66% CI [54.3–77.9], for those with RV diameter reduction < 2 mm 51% CI [39.8–61.4].

Similar articles

References

    1. Ponikowski P., Voors A. A., Anker S. D., et al., ESC Scientific Document Group ., “2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed With the Special Contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC,” European Heart Journal 37, no. 27 (July 2016): 2129–2200. - PubMed
    1. Makki N., Mesubi O., Steyers C., Olshansky B., and Abraham W. T., “Meta‐Analysis of the Relation of Ventricular Arrhythmias to All‐Cause Mortality After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device,” American Journal of Cardiology 116 (2015): 1385–1390. - PubMed
    1. Topilsky Y., Oh J. K., Atchison F. W., et al., “Echocardiographic Findings in Stable Outpatients With Properly Functioning Heartmate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24, no. 2 (February 2011): 157–169. - PubMed
    1. Estep J. D., Stainback R. F., Little S. H., Torre G., and Zoghbi W. A., “The Role of Echocardiography and Other Imaging Modalities in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 3, no. 10 (October 2010): 1049–1064. - PubMed
    1. Topilsky Y., Oh J. K., Shah D. K., et al., “Echocardiographic Predictors of Adverse Outcomes After Continuous Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 4, no. 3 (March 2011): 211–222. - PubMed

MeSH terms