Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024:9:1442318.
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1442318. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC) Model to Facilitate Undergraduate Science Education Reform

Denise L Monti  1 Julia C Gill  2 Tamarah L Adair  3 Sandra D Adams  4 Yesmi Patricia Ahumada-Santos  5 Isabel Amaya  6 Kirk R Anders  7 Justin R Anderson  8 Mauricio S Antunes  9 Mary A Ayuk  10 Frederick N Baliraine  11 Tonya C Bates  12 Andrea R Beyer  13 Suparna S Bhalla  14 Tejas Bouklas  15 Sharon K Bullock  12 Kristen A Butela  16 Christine A Byrum  17 Steven M Caruso  18 Rebecca A Chong  19 Hui-Min Chung  20 Stephanie B Conant  21 Brett M Condon  22 Katie E Crump  23 Tom D'Elia  24 Megan K Dennis  25 Linda C DeVeaux  26 Lautaro Diacovich  27 Arturo Diaz  28 Iain Duffy  29 Dustin C Edwards  30 Patricia C Fallest-Strobl  31 Ann M Findley  32 Matthew R Fisher  33 Marie P Fogarty  34 Victoria J Frost  35 Maria D Gainey  36 Courtney S Galle  37 Bryan Gibb  38 Urszula P Golebiewska  39 Hugo C Gramajo  27 Anna S Grinath  40 Jennifer A Guerrero  41 Nancy A Guild  42 Kathryn E Gunn  43 Susan M Gurney  44 Lee E Hughes  9 Pradeepa Jayachandran  45 Kristen C Johnson  46 Allison A Johnson  47 Alison E Kanak  48 Michelle L Kanther  49 Rodney A King  50 Kathryn P Kohl  35 Julia Y Lee-Soety  51 Lynn O Lewis  52 Heather M Lindberg  53 Jaclyn A Madden  54 Breonna J Martin  54 Matthew D Mastropaolo  31 Sean P McClory  55 Evan C Merkhofer  14 Julie A Merkle  56 Jon C Mitchell  57 María Alejandra Mussi  27 Fernando E Nieto-Fernandez  58 Jillian C Nissen  58 Imade Y Nsa  59 Mary G O'Donnell  60 R Deborah Overath  61 Shallee T Page  62 Andrea Panagakis  63 Jesús Ricardo Parra Unda  5 Michelle B Pass  12 Tiara G Perez Morales  64 Nick T Peters  65 Ruth Plymale  66 Richard S Pollenz  67 Nathan S Reyna  66 Claire A Rinehart  50 Jessica M Rocheleau  68 John S Rombold  69 Ombeline Rossier  70 Adam D Rudner  71 Elizabeth E Rueschhoff  72 Christopher D Shaffer  73 Mary Ann V Smith  74 Amy B Sprenkle  75 C Nicole Sunnen  51 Michael A Thomas  40 Michelle M Tigges  76 Deborah M Tobiason  77 Sara S Tolsma  78 Julie Torruellas Garcia  23 Peter Uetz  47 Edwin Vazquez  79 Catherine M Ward  34 Vassie C Ware  80 Jacqueline M Washington  81 Matthew J Waterman  82 Daniel E Westholm  83 Keith A Wheaton  84 Simon J White  85 Beth C Williams  86 Daniel C Williams  87 Ellen M Wisner  12 William H Biederman  88 Steven G Cresawn  89 Danielle M Heller  88 Deborah Jacobs-Sera  16 Daniel A Russell  16 Graham F Hatfull  16 David J Asai  88 David I Hanauer  90 Mark J Graham  91 Viknesh Sivanathan  88
Affiliations

An inclusive Research Education Community (iREC) Model to Facilitate Undergraduate Science Education Reform

Denise L Monti et al. Front Educ (Lausanne). 2024.

Abstract

Over the last two decades, there have been numerous initiatives to improve undergraduate student outcomes in STEM. One model for scalable reform is the inclusive Research Education Community (iREC). In an iREC, STEM faculty from colleges and universities across the nation are supported to adopt and sustainably implement course-based research - a form of science pedagogy that enhances student learning and persistence in science. In this study, we used pathway modelling to develop a qualitative description that explicates the HHMI Science Education Alliance (SEA) iREC as a model for facilitating the successful adoption and continued advancement of new curricular content and pedagogy. In particular, outcomes that faculty realize through their participation in the SEA iREC were identified, organized by time, and functionally linked. The resulting pathway model was then revised and refined based on several rounds of feedback from over 100 faculty members in the SEA iREC who participated in the study. Our results show that in an iREC, STEM faculty organized as a long-standing community of practice leverage one another, outside expertise, and data to adopt, implement, and iteratively advance their pedagogy. The opportunity to collaborate in this manner and, additionally, to be recognized for pedagogical contributions sustainably engages STEM faculty in the advancement of their pedagogy. Here, we present a detailed pathway model of SEA that, together with underpinning features of an iREC identified in this study, offers a framework to facilitate transformations in undergraduate science education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1.
Fig.1.
Full SEA faculty pathway model. SEA faculty outcomes occur at different points in time throughout their engagement with SEA: short-term outcomes (pink boxes), medium-term outcomes (lilac boxes), and long-term outcomes (light green). Connections between outcomes are depicted by arrows.
Fig.2.
Fig.2.
Full SEA faculty pathway model color-coded by outcome category. Outcomes that SEA faculty realize through their participation in the SEA program are grouped into four different categories: Knowledge and Skill Acquisition (yellow boxes), Knowledge and Skill Advancement (orange boxes), Community (blue boxes), and Psychological Affirmation (green boxes). Outcomes that fall into two categories are shaded in both colors.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Categorized SEA Faculty Pathway Model. SEA faculty outcomes are grouped into four categories: Knowledge & Skill Acquisition, Knowledge & Skill Advancement, Community, and Psychological Affirmations; the category “Community” can be sub-divided into “Networked Community” and “Community of Supportive Practitioners”. The general relationship of outcomes between these categories, and the timeframe in which faculty are most likely to realize the outcome, are represented by colored boxes and the order in which they appear, from left to right. Within the first year of participating in SEA, faculty realize outcomes related to Knowledge & Skill Acquisition and become networked with other members of the SEA community. In subsequent years, faculty advance their science pedagogy as they engage one another as members of the SEA community. Thus, over time, a community of supportive practitioners grows and learns together. Over time, faculty realize outcomes related to Psychological Affirmations, which promotes their sense of connectedness to their peers, competence as educators, and appreciation for the profession.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Knowledge and skill advancement through iterative cycles of instruction, feedback and assessment, and experimentation. SEA faculty spend a year engaging a cohort of students in course-based research. Towards the conclusion of each year, faculty receive student assessment data and have opportunities to share and discuss their research findings and teaching strategies with the SEA community. Through these opportunities, faculty learn how to better implement course-based research, including the development of new science pedagogy resources that are shared with community. This is an iterative process. Dashed lines represent outcomes that are indirectly linked in the full pathway model; solid lines represent outcomes that are directly linked.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Highly connected outcomes (hubs). Hubs are highly interconnected outcomes that are impacted by and impact multiple outcomes in a pathway model. (A) “As a community, faculty learn together about what works in the classroom and laboratory” was identified as a hub. It is an outcome in the categories of “Knowledge & Skill Advancement” and “Community” and is connected to many outcomes across these two categories. (B) “Faculty find this work rewarding” was identified as a hub. It is an outcome in the category “Psychological Affirmations” and is connected to multiple outcomes across multiple categories.

References

    1. Auchincloss LC, Laursen SL, Branchaw JL, Eagan K, Graham M, Hanauer DI, Lawrie G, McLinn CM, Pelaez N, Rowland S, Towns M, Trautmann NM, Varma-Nelson P, Weston TJ, Dolan EL. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE Life Sci Educ. 13(1):29–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allee V (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner, 32(4).
    1. Bathgate ME, Aragón OR, Cavanagh AJ, Waterhouse JK, Frederick J, & Graham MJ. (2019). Perceived supports and evidence-based teaching in college STEM. International journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beach AL, Sorcinelli MD, Austin AE, & Rivard J. (2016) Faculty Development in the Age of Evidence: Current Practices, Future Imperatives, by. K. Stylus Publishing
    1. Brewer C, Smith D, eds. (2011) Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.

LinkOut - more resources