Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 2:14:1423405.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1423405. eCollection 2024.

Computer-aided endoscopic diagnostic system modified with hyperspectral imaging for the classification of esophageal neoplasms

Affiliations

Computer-aided endoscopic diagnostic system modified with hyperspectral imaging for the classification of esophageal neoplasms

Yao-Kuang Wang et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The early detection of esophageal cancer is crucial to enhancing patient survival rates, and endoscopy remains the gold standard for identifying esophageal neoplasms. Despite this fact, accurately diagnosing superficial esophageal neoplasms poses a challenge, even for seasoned endoscopists. Recent advancements in computer-aided diagnostic systems, empowered by artificial intelligence (AI), have shown promising results in elevating the diagnostic precision for early-stage esophageal cancer.

Methods: In this study, we expanded upon traditional red-green-blue (RGB) imaging by integrating the YOLO neural network algorithm with hyperspectral imaging (HSI) to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of this innovative AI system for superficial esophageal neoplasms. A total of 1836 endoscopic images were utilized for model training, which included 858 white-light imaging (WLI) and 978 narrow-band imaging (NBI) samples. These images were categorized into three groups, namely, normal esophagus, esophageal squamous dysplasia, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Results: An additional set comprising 257 WLI and 267 NBI images served as the validation dataset to assess diagnostic accuracy. Within the RGB dataset, the diagnostic accuracies of the WLI and NBI systems for classifying images into normal, dysplasia, and SCC categories were 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Conversely, the HSI dataset yielded higher diagnostic accuracies for the WLI and NBI systems, with scores of 0.90 and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion: The HSI dataset outperformed the RGB dataset, demonstrating an overall diagnostic accuracy improvement of 8%. Our findings underscored the advantageous impact of incorporating the HSI dataset in model training. Furthermore, the application of HSI in AI-driven image recognition algorithms significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy for early esophageal cancer.

Keywords: Dysplasia; Esophageal Cancer; Hyperspectral imaging; Narrow-band imaging; SSD; YOLOv5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author H.-C.W was employed by the company Hitspectra Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of HSI algorithm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spectrum distributions of (A) WLIs and (B) NBIs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Complete process of the algorithm designed in this study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
presents the YOLOv5 diagnostic outcomes for the WLI and NBI images of esophageal neoplasms. Blue boxes signify the ground truth. Green-bordered boxes highlight areas identified as esophageal dysplasia, whereas purple-bordered boxes indicate SCC regions. The labels’ numbers indicate the likelihood of an esophageal-neoplasm diagnosis within the box.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malhotra GK, Yanala U, Ravipati A, Matthew M, Vijayakumar M, Are C. Global trends in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. (2017) 115:564–79. doi: 10.1002/jso.v115.5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Kelsen DP, Hofstetter WL, Apperson-Hansen C, Blackstone EH. Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Dis Esophagus. (2016) 29:897–905. doi: 10.1111/dote.2016.29.issue-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. (2013) 19:5598–606. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez de Santiago E, Hernanz N, Marcos-Prieto HM, De-Jorge-Turrión MÁ, Barreiro-Alonso E, Rodríguez-Escaja C, et al. Rate of missed oesophageal cancer at routine endoscopy and survival outcomes: A multicentric cohort study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. (2019) 7:189–98. doi: 10.1177/2050640618811477 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources