Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec;84(1):2438429.
doi: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2438429. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Healthcare delivery in the arctic-telehealth prospects

Affiliations
Review

Healthcare delivery in the arctic-telehealth prospects

Yonatan Hayoun et al. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

The Arctic region, characterised by its remote and geographically challenging environment, is home to predominantly Indigenous populations who experience significant healthcare disparities compared to urban counterparts. This paper synthesises evidence on the persistent challenges in delivering healthcare in the Arctic, including geographical remoteness, healthcare personnel shortages, and cultural and language barriers. Telehealth emerges as a crucial solution, offering a nuanced approach to overcoming physical and systemic barriers. We review current implementations of telehealth in the Arctic, highlighting successful adaptations to local cultural contexts and technological limitations. By integrating a patient-centred approach, infrastructure readiness, and relevant telehealth services, a holistic healthcare delivery model tailored for the Arctic environment is proposed. New type of technologies is also proposed to enhance remote care possibilities. This paper underscores the need for collaborative efforts in research, policy making, and healthcare provision to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of health services in the Arctic, aiming to close the gap in health equity. Key references from seminal works and recent studies provide a foundation for the discussions and recommendations presented.

Keywords: Arctic healthcare; cultural differences; health disparities; indigenous health; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson RC, Rourke J, Oandasan IF, et al. Progress made on access to rural health care in Canada. Can J Rural Med. 2020;25(1):14–9. doi: 10.4103/CJRM.CJRM_84_19 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Young TK, Bjerregaard P.. Towards estimating the indigenous population in circumpolar regions. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019;78(1):11653749. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1653749 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruscio BA, Brubaker M, Glasser J, et al. One health – a strategy for resilience in a changing arctic. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015;74(1):27913. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27913 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce M, Zulz T, Koch A. Surveillance of infectious diseases in the Arctic. Publ Health. 2016;137:5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.06.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guzman Herrador B, de Blasio BF, Carlander A, et al. Association between heavy precipitation events and waterborne outbreaks in four Nordic countries, 1992–2012. J Water Health. 2016;14(6):1019–1027. doi: 10.2166/wh.2016.071 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources