Alzheimer's disease mortality among taxi and ambulance drivers: population based cross sectional study
- PMID: 39689964
- PMCID: PMC11648082
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082194
Alzheimer's disease mortality among taxi and ambulance drivers: population based cross sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To analyze mortality attributed to Alzheimer's disease among taxi drivers and ambulance drivers, occupations that demand frequent spatial and navigational processing, compared with other occupations.
Design: Population based cross-sectional study.
Setting: Use of death certificates from the National Vital Statistics System in the United States, which were linked to occupation, 1 January 2020-31 December 2022.
Participants: Deceased adults aged 18 years and older.
Main outcomes measures: Among 443 occupations studied, percentage of deaths attributed to Alzheimer's disease for taxi drivers and ambulance drivers and each of the remaining 441 occupations, adjusting for age at death and other sociodemographic factors.
Results: Of 8 972 221 people who had died with occupational information, 3.88% (348 328) had Alzheimer's disease listed as a cause of death. Among taxi drivers, 1.03% (171/16 658) died from Alzheimer's disease, while among ambulance drivers, the rate was 0.74% (10/1348). After adjustment, ambulance drivers (0.91% (95% confidence interval 0.35% to 1.48%)) and taxi drivers (1.03% (0.87% to 1.18%)) had the lowest proportion of deaths due to Alzheimer's disease of all occupations examined. This trend was not observed in other transportation related jobs that are less reliant on real time spatial and navigational processing or for other types of dementia. Results were consistent whether Alzheimer's disease was recorded as an underlying or contributing cause of death.
Conclusions: Taxi drivers and ambulance drivers, occupations involving frequent navigational and spatial processing, had the lowest proportions of deaths attributed to Alzheimer's disease of all occupations.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: funding to CMW by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. ABJ reports receiving (in the past 36 months) consulting fees unrelated to this work from Analysis Group. ABJ also reports receiving (in the past 36 months) income unrelated to this work from hosting the podcast Freakonomics, MD, from book rights to Doubleday Books, and authorship income from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Los Angeles Times. CMW reports receiving (in the past 36 months) consulting fees unrelated to this work from Alosa Health, Analysis Group, Atheneum, Berkshire Hathaway Home Companies, Chronius, FVC Health, GLG, Guidepoint, NuvoAir, Ogilvy, Philips, Simbo, Substack, Tell Health, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal, and income unrelated to this book from book rights to Doubleday Books.
Figures
Comment in
-
Zwei einfache Berufe schützen am besten vor Alzheimer.MMW Fortschr Med. 2025 Feb;167(3):30. doi: 10.1007/s15006-025-4732-y. MMW Fortschr Med. 2025. PMID: 39979730 Review. German. No abstract available.
References
-
- Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, et al. GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators . Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:88-106. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical