Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 3:12:1460981.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460981. eCollection 2024.

The bacterial burden of worn face masks-observational research and literature review

Affiliations
Review

The bacterial burden of worn face masks-observational research and literature review

Kai Kisielinski et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Facemasks were widely mandated during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Especially the use by the general population is associated with a higher risk of improper handling of the mask and contamination and potential adverse microbiological consequences.

Methods: We investigated and quantified bacterial accumulation in facemasks used by the general population, using 16S rRNA (Sanger Sequencing), culture and biochemical analysis along with Rose Bengal staining. Additionally, a systematic overview of the literature on face mask contamination was undertaken.

Results: We found an average bacterial load of 4.24 × 104 CFU recovered/mask, with a maximum load of 2.85 × 105 CFU. This maximum is 310 times higher than the limit value for contamination of ventilation system outlet surfaces specified by the German standard VDI 6022. Biochemical and molecular identification predominantly found Staphylococcus species (80%), including Staphylococcus aureus, along with endospore-forming Bacillus spp. Literature reports also indicate contamination of masks by bacterial and fungal opportunists of the genera Acinetobacter, Aspergillus, Alternaria, Bacillus, Cadosporium, Candida, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Klebsiella (including K. pneumoniae), Micrococcus, Microsporum, Mucor, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. Bacterial counts increase linearly with wearing duration.

Discussion: Prolonged use may affect the skin and respiratory microbiomes, promoting consequential eye, skin, oral and airway conditions. These aspects underscore the urgent need for further research and a risk-benefit analysis in respect of mask use, particularly given their unproven efficacy in disrupting the transmission of respiratory viruses and their adverse social consequences.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; N95; Rose Bengal staining; adverse effects; bacterial contamination; personal protective equipment; risk; surgical mask.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rose Bengal staining of worn face masks. The area analysed is marked by the red frame. The mask dimensions indicated by the manufactures (175 × 95 mm) exclude folds, which enlarge the surface area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example masks staining with Bengal Rose, binding to tissue cells, debris and bacteria.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The relative abundance of different bacterial species recovered from masks.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PRISMA flow chart for the literature search.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time dependency of face mask contamination during wear, based upon literature data (Table 2). The diagrams indicate the association between CFU/mask and wearing duration, based on mean values from three publications (41, 46, 67). If included in the primary studies, the standard deviations are also shown. Yang et al. investigated the inner surfaces of masks worn by the general population, whereas both Liu et al. and Checchi et al. examined the outer layers of masks worn by HCW.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Face covering policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, our world in data. (2023). Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/face-covering-policies-covid (Accessed December 29, 2022).
    1. Ladhani SN. Face masking for children - time to reconsider. J Infect. (2022) 85:623–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.09.020, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson S. Mask mandates for children during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international human rights perspective. Scand J Public Health. (2022) 50:683–5. doi: 10.1177/14034948221081087, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization, U.N.C. Fund (UNICEF) . WHO – Advice on the use of masks for children in the community in the context of COVID-19: annex to the advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19, 21 August 2020. (2020). Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/333919 (Accessed November 7, 2020).
    1. Schwarz S, Jenetzky E, Krafft H, Maurer T, Martin D. Corona child studies “co-Ki”: first results of a Germany-wide register on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. (2021) 169:353–65. doi: 10.1007/s00112-021-01133-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources