Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 3:15:1487610.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1487610. eCollection 2024.

Leveraging the synergy between anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat digestive system cancers

Affiliations
Review

Leveraging the synergy between anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat digestive system cancers

Qinlan Xu et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

The response rates to immunotherapy vary widely depending on the type of cancer and the specific treatment used and can be disappointingly low for many solid tumors. Fortunately, due to their complementary mechanisms of action, immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy have synergistic effects in cancer treatment. By normalizing the tumor vasculature, anti-angiogenic therapy can improve blood flow and oxygenation to facilitate better immune cell infiltration into the tumor and enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. It also reduces immunosuppressive factors and enhances immune activation, to create a more favorable environment for immune cells to attack the tumor. Their combination leverages the strengths of both therapies to enhance anti-tumor effects and improve patient outcomes. This review discusses the vasculature-immunity crosstalk in the tumor microenvironment and summarizes the latest advances in combining anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat digestive system tumors.

Keywords: anti-angiogenic therapy; digestive system cancer; immune checkpoint blockade; immunotherapy; tumor microenvironment; vessel normalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
VEGF and angiogenesis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by different immune cells. mDCs and M1-type TAMs release IFN-α, IL-12, and other cytokines, alongside chemokines like CXCL9 and CXCL10, to inhibit angiogenesis. CD8+T cells and TH1 cells additionally secrete IFN-γ, which suppresses angiogenesis and promotes vascular normalization. Conversely, iDCs, MDSCs, M2-type TAMs, and TEM cells promote angiogenesis through factors like VEGF and IL-10, while Tregs, TH2, and TH17 cells contribute by releasing VEGF and IL-4. Immune cells further regulate angiogenesis through interactions. For instance, mDCs and TH1 cells can polarize macrophages toward the M1 type, whereas MDSCs and Tregs reprogram TAMs toward the M2 type. Some MDSCs can even differentiate into endothelial-like cells and incorporate into the tumor vasculature.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mechanisms of angiogenesis in tumors. (A) Sprouting angiogenesis, during which a new vessel branches from an existing vessel. The key biological process involves the balance between the formation of “tip” and “stalk” endothelial cells. (B) Vasculogenesis, during which new blood vessels are generated by endothelial progenitor cells to form networks without the presence of pre-existing vessels. (C) Intussusceptive angiogenesis, which involves the formation of a double lumen and the split of an existing vessel into two new functional blood vessels. (D) Vascular mimicry. Tumor cells form vessel-like structures independently of endothelial cells to facilitate blood flow. (E) Vessel co-option. Tumor cells utilize existing blood vessels for their blood supply. (F) Transdifferentiation. Certain cancer stem cells differentiate into endothelial-like cells and integrate into the vascular structure to support the tumor’s blood supply. RBCs, red blood cells; ECs, endothelial cells; CSCs, cancer stem cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. (2021) 16:223–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer in 2022. Cancer Discovery. (2022) 12:2733–8. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-1134 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naimi A, Mohammed RN, Raji A, Chupradit S, Yumashev AV, Suksatan W, et al. . Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons. Cell Commun Signal. (2022) 20:44. doi: 10.1186/s12964-022-00854-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vafaei S, Zekiy AO, Khanamir RA, Zaman BA, Ghayourvahdat A, Azimizonuzi H, et al. . Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); a new frontier. Cancer Cell Int. (2022) 22:2. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02407-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meybodi SM, Farasati Far B, Pourmolaei A, Baradarbarjastehbaf F, Safaei M, Mohammadkhani N, et al. . Immune checkpoint inhibitors promising role in cancer therapy: clinical evidence and immune-related adverse events. Med Oncol. (2023) 40:243. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02114-6 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources