Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec;22(4):e70021.
doi: 10.1002/msc.70021.

Physiotherapists' Experiences and Perceived Acceptability of Delivering a Knee Bracing Intervention for People With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in a Randomised Trial (PROP OA): A Qualitative Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Physiotherapists' Experiences and Perceived Acceptability of Delivering a Knee Bracing Intervention for People With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in a Randomised Trial (PROP OA): A Qualitative Study

Laurna Bullock et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore physiotherapists' experiences and perceived acceptability of delivering a bracing intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the 'PROvision of braces for Patients with knee OA' (PROP OA) randomised controlled trial.

Method: Semi-structured telephone interviews with consenting physiotherapists who received the PROP OA training programme and delivered the knee bracing intervention (advice, information and exercise instruction plus knee brace matched to patients' clinical and radiographic presentation and with adherence support). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two-stage analytic framework: inductive thematic analysis preceded mapping to constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Results: Eight physiotherapists were interviewed and six key themes were developed. Perceptions of the training programme were generally positive, but additional formal training and experiential learning consolidated confidence and skills in novel intervention components. Advice, information, and exercise instruction reflected usual physiotherapy care for knee OA. Physiotherapists were confident in delivering the knee brace, but determining the pattern of knee OA to inform brace type selection was challenging. Physiotherapists valued brace adherence enhancing strategies and the follow-up appointment to facilitate adherence. Perceived impact of the bracing intervention for people with OA was positive. The bracing intervention was perceived as acceptable, although improving self-efficacy to deliver novel intervention components (e.g., reading x-rays) would enhance acceptability.

Conclusion: The complex knee bracing intervention was broadly perceived as acceptable by physiotherapists. If implemented within clinical practice beyond the trial, physiotherapists might benefit from not only initial training in brace selection but also ongoing support and mentoring to increase self-efficacy in delivery.

Keywords: bracing; knee; osteoarthritis; physiotherapy; qualitative; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CDM is director of the National Institute for Health and Care Research School for Primary Care Research (SPCR). All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adler, A. J. , Martin N., Mariani J., et al. 2017. “Mobile Phone Text Messaging to Improve Medication Adherence in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, no. 4. 10.1002/14651858.CD011851.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison, K. , Nelligan R., Lawford B., et al. n.d., “The Experiences of Physiotherapists Delivering a Very Low Energy Diet and Exercise Intervention for Weight Loss in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study.” Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy: (under Review).
    1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons . 2021. Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Non‐arthroplasty): Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). https://www.aaos.org/oak3cpg.
    1. Bannuru, R. R. , Osani M. C., Vaysbrot E. E., et al. 2019. “OARSI Guidelines for the Non‐Surgical Management of Knee, Hip, and Polyarticular Osteoarthritis.” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 27, no. 11: 1578–1589. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bichsel, D. , Liechti F. D., Schlapbach J. M., and Wertli M. M.. 2022. “Cross‐sectional Analysis of Recommendations for the Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in Clinical Guidelines.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103, no. 3: 559–569.e5. 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.801. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources