Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):65.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05667-x.

The intrapelvic approach to the acetabulum

Affiliations
Review

The intrapelvic approach to the acetabulum

Axel Gänsslen et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. .

Abstract

The today well accepted intrapelvic approach for acetabular and pelvic ring injury fixation was first described by Hirvensalo and Lindahl in 1993 followed by a more detailed description by Cole and Bolhofner in 1994. Compared to the well-known ilioinguinal approach, described by Letournel, this approach allows an intrapelvic view to the medial acetabulum, while using the ilioinguinal approach a more superior, extrapelvic view, is dissected to the area of the acetabulum. Several names have been used to describe the new intrapelvic approach with increasing usage, mainly ilio-anterior approach, extended Pfannenstiel approach, Stoppa-approach, Rives-Stoppa approach, modified Stoppa approach and recently anterior intrapelvic approach. Especially names including "Stoppa", based on the French surgeon Rene Stoppa, an inguinal hernia surgeon, have been discussed. In contrast to the presently used intrapelvic approach, the original the Rives-Stoppa approach refers to a sublay-retromuscular technique, which places a mesh posterior to the rectus muscle and anterior to the posterior rectus sheath without dissecting along the upper pubic ramus. Thus, intrapelvic approach is not a Rives-Stoppa approach. The Cheatle-Henry approach, another inguinal hernia approach, refers best to the presently used intrapelvic approach. Discussing the anatomy and the different dissections, this approach allows anteromedial access to the anterior column and a direct view from inside the true pelvis to the quadrilateral plate and medial side of the posterior column. Thus, we favor to use the term "Intrapelvic Approach".

Keywords: Extended intrapelvic approach; Intrapelvic approach; Results; Stoppa´s hernia repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Level of evidence: V Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Drawing from Henry showing the access to the superior ramus [19]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic concept of the Rives-Stoppa retromuscular approach

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Açan A, Kılınç C, Gültaç E, Altıparmak B, Uysal A, Aydoğan H (2020) Effects of different anesthesia techniques on intraoperative blood loss in acetabular fractures undergoing the Modified Stoppa approach. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 26:445–452 - PubMed
    1. Al Adawy A, Aziz A, FA ES, Mahmoud W, Mabrook M, El-Sayed Hassan Y (2020) Modified Stoppa as an alternative surgical approach for fixation of anterior fracture acetabulum: a randomized control clinical trial. J Orthop Surg Res 15:154. 10.1186/s13018-020-01660-3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alimi Y, Merle C, Sosin M, Mahan M, Bhanot P (2020) Mesh and plane selection: a summary of options and outcomes. Plast Aesthet Res 7:5
    1. Andersen R, O´Toole R, Nascone J, Frisch MFS, M. and, CW T (2010) Modified Stoppa Approach for Acetabular Fractures with anterior and posterior column displacement: Quantification of Radiographic Reduction and analysis of Interobserver Variability. J Orthop Trauma 24:271–278 - PubMed
    1. Bastian J, Tannast M, Siebenrock K, Keel M (2013) Mid-term results in relation to age and analysis of predictive factors after fixation of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Injury 44(12):1793–1798 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources