Prioritizing vaccine introduction to China's National Immunization Program: a multi-criteria decision analysis
- PMID: 39695502
- PMCID: PMC11658352
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21013-7
Prioritizing vaccine introduction to China's National Immunization Program: a multi-criteria decision analysis
Abstract
Background: To prioritize the introducing of new vaccines into China's National Immunization Program (NIP) among 10 candidate vaccines across four classes.
Methods: We developed a vaccine value framework using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to simulate the introduction of new vaccines into NIP, covering 21 criteria encompassing six dimensions: safety, effectiveness, economy, innovation, accessibility, and appropriateness. Two decision scenarios were considered: Scenario One prioritized the four classes of vaccines, while Scenario Two identified specific vaccines within each class.
Results: In the vaccine value framework, safety received the highest weight, while innovation received the lowest. The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was identified as a top priority for inclusion in NIP, followed by Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV), Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (HIB), and Rotavirus (RV) vaccines. The specific types are domestic bivalent HPV vaccine, imported 13-valent PCV vaccine, domestic HIB vaccine, and domestic RV vaccine. The results of the one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated robustness.
Conclusions: This study provides a transparent, comprehensive, and quantifiable vaccine value framework to aid decision-making for introducing new vaccines into China's NIP. According to the MCDA results, HPV should be considered the top vaccine candidate for the NIP.
Keywords: China; Multi-criteria decision analysis; National immunization program; Vaccines.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors were informed about intent to publish results. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Prioritization of the introduction of new vaccines to the national immunization program in the Republic of Korea.Vaccine. 2014 Oct 21;32(46):6049-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 18. Vaccine. 2014. PMID: 25239482
-
Advancing the National Immunization Program in an era of achieving universal vaccine coverage in China and beyond.Infect Dis Poverty. 2024 Mar 13;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40249-024-01192-6. Infect Dis Poverty. 2024. PMID: 38475849 Free PMC article.
-
National and provincial impact and cost-effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in China: a modeling analysis.BMC Med. 2021 Aug 11;19(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02049-7. BMC Med. 2021. PMID: 34376214 Free PMC article.
-
Adding new childhood vaccines to China's National Immunization Program: evidence, benefits, and priorities.Lancet Public Health. 2023 Dec;8(12):e1016-e1024. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00248-7. Lancet Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38000881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The coverage and challenges of increasing uptake of non-National Immunization Program vaccines in China: a scoping review.Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 Dec 8;12(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01150-8. Infect Dis Poverty. 2023. PMID: 38062480 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Adverse Events Following Haemophilus influenzae Type b (Hib) Monovalent Vaccines in Zhejiang Province, China, from 2017 to 2023.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;13(4):349. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13040349. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40333242 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Timmis JK, Black S, Rappuoli R. Improving accountability in vaccine decision-making. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(11):1057–66. - PubMed
-
- Hamilton K, Baron MD, Matsuo K, Visser D. Rinderpest eradication: challenges for remaining disease free and implications for future eradication efforts. Rev Sci Tech. 2017;36(2):579–88. - PubMed
-
- Ikilezi G, Augusto OJ, Dieleman JL, Sherr K, Lim SS. Effect of donor funding for immunization from Gavi and other development assistance channels on vaccine coverage: evidence from 120 low and middle income recipient countries. Vaccine. 2020;38(3):588–96. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources