Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):536.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03807-w.

A brief effective screening protocol for identifying cataract patients with binocular vision anomalies

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A brief effective screening protocol for identifying cataract patients with binocular vision anomalies

Qing-Qing Tan et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: To compare the effectiveness of a brief binocular vision screening protocol to a comprehensive examination for detecting binocular vision anomalies before and after cataract surgery.

Methods: A comprehensive binocular vision test battery as a gold standard were administered on recruited patients before the first surgery and at the third visit after surgery on the second eye. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to illustrate the diagnostic ability of each test. In addition, a univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further determine the contribution of each preoperative test to the prediction of pre- and post-surgical binocular vision anomalies.

Results: Significant differences were shown for the difference in phoria from distance to near measured by the cover test (Area Under Curve [AUC] = 0.96, P < 0.01), step vergence testing of positive fusional vergence at distance (AUC = 0.71, P < 0.01) and near (AUC = 0.77, P < 0.01). The other tests did not show statistically significant differences. The ROC curve generated by combining the difference in distance and near phoria with positive fusional vergence at both distance and near demonstrated a more robust measure of diagnostic accuracy. (AUC = 0.98, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Distance and near phoria difference measured by cover test has similar effectiveness as a comprehensive binocular vision testing protocol for the diagnosis of binocular vision anomalies. Distance and near positive fusional vergence measured by step vergence testing also have significant predictive value. A combination of the two tests is an outstanding screening protocol for binocular vision anomalies before cataract surgery.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03592615, Date of registration: July 19, 2018).

Keywords: Age-related; Binocular vision anomaly; Cataract; Screening protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Salus University. Eligible subjects were asked to sign a written informed consent and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPPA) authorization before any study testing was administered. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve showing the diagnostic ability of each binocular vision test, a combination of cover test and positive fusional vergence. (Note: the source of the curve in the figure was sorted by AUC from large to small; CT_DIFF: cover test measured lateral phoria difference between distance and near; BO_NEAR_BREAK: break point of positive fusional vergence at near using base-out prism; BO_DIST_BREAK: break point of positive fusional vergence at distance using base-out prism; BI_DIST_BREAK: break point of negative fusional vergence at distance using base-in prism; BI_NEAR_BREAK: break point of negative fusional vergence at near using base-in prism; VF_NEAR: vergence facility at near; VF_DIST: vergence facility at distance; NPC BREAK: break point of near point of convergence; CISS: convergence insufficiency symptom survey score; CT: cover test; PFV: positive fusional vergence; Reference line: the line with a AUC of 0.5 that indicates a test no better than chance; *: indicating a statistically significant difference from the reference line.)

References

    1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:614–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomez ML. Measuring the quality of vision after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:3–11. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kretz FTA, Breyer D, Klabe K, Hagen P, Kaymak H, Koss MJ, et al. Clinical outcomes after implantation of a trifocal toric intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:504–10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poll JT, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens compared to peripheral corneal relaxing incisions. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:165–71. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gawęcki M, Grzybowski A. Diplopia as the complication of cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1–6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data