Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1489.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06510-y.

Ultrasound education, competencies and expected future use among medical interns in Denmark: a national cross-sectional study

Pernille Gram  1 , Thomas Purup  2 , Emilie Marie Eriksen  2   3 , Stina Søbye  3 , Simone Kjaergaard Wielandt  3 , Kasper Astorp  3 , Martin Bach Jensen  2   3 , Camilla Aakjaer Andersen  2   3
Affiliations

Ultrasound education, competencies and expected future use among medical interns in Denmark: a national cross-sectional study

Pernille Gram et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound is increasingly used across medical specialties, calling for timely and relevant ultrasound education in specialty training. To enable customizing such education, we aimed to explore medical interns' received ultrasound education during medical school and internship, perceived scanning competencies, evaluation of received education, future expectations for using ultrasound, and tendencies for perceiving ultrasound competence.

Methods: This was a national cross-sectional study. We developed a questionnaire based on a theoretical conceptual model, individual interviews with medical interns and focus groups with medical students, followed by pilot testing. The questionnaire was distributed to all medical interns in Denmark (N = 1231). Data were summarized with descriptive statistics. Differences between universities and tendencies for perceiving ultrasound competence were analyzed with Fisher's exact tests and modified Poisson regression, respectively.

Results: Responses from 420 (34.1%) interns were included. Although varying across medical schools, 95.7% received formal ultrasound training and 86.0% encountered ultrasound examinations through clinical rotation. During internship, 44.2% received formal training, while 68.5% had to pursue it independently. Ultrasound examinations during clinical work were observed by 73.2% and performed by 47.6%. Common ultrasound usage barriers were insufficient scanning routine, supervision, knowledge, confidence and mental surplus. Ultrasound competence gain from medical school and internship was reported by 75.2% and 55.3%, respectively, but mainly to lesser/some extent. Most desired more training, expected to use ultrasound in the future (71.0%) and considered it a core competence (73.0%). Perceived ultrasound competence was significantly associated with receiving practical (RR: 4.08) or both practical and theoretical education (RR: 4.34) in medical school, and practical training on patients (RR: 1.09), required number of performed scans (RR: 1.06), competence test(s) (RR: 1.07), and/or consulting books/encyclopedia (RR:1.07) during internship.

Conclusions: Ultrasound training is part of medical school curricula but varies in type and extent. While most encounter and many use ultrasound during internships, formal training is less integrated. Most desire more training and attitudes towards future ultrasound usage are positive. Filled curricula pose dilemmas for prioritization and several barriers prevail for using ultrasound, representing missed opportunities for competence development and maintenance. Training governance and scaffolding continuous learning may be needed.

Trial registration: None.

Keywords: Medical education; Medical internship; Point-of-care ultrasound; Scanning competence; Survey; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. According to Danish law (komitélovens § 14, stk. 2), no ethical approval was needed for this project. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Questionnaire development
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant inclusion
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Selected ultrasound applications across medical education
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evaluation of received ultrasound education
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dietrich CF, Goudie A, Chiorean L, Cui XW, Gilja OH, Dong Y, et al. Point of care ultrasound: a WFUMB position paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(1):49–58. - PubMed
    1. Cantisani V, Dietrich C, Badea R, Dudea S, Prosch H, Cerezo E, et al. EFSUMB statement on medical student education in ultrasound [long version]. Ultrasound Int Open. 2016;02(01):E2-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749–57. - PubMed
    1. Andersen CA, Holden S, Vela J, Rathleff MS, Jensen MB. Point-of-care ultrasound in general practice: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):61–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy SD. Opinion: the use of point-of-care sonography in primary care: an ethical perspective. South Afr Fam Pract. 2022;64(1). Available from: https://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpj/article/view/5410. Cited 2024 Aug 30. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources